[QUOTE=JCorre]
I’ll probably regret this but I think its a good question for some of the posters in this thread.
What would you do if you passed by a homeless person that was brain damaged or had some other mental disability? Would you call these people “in need of aid” or “in need of assistance”? They certainly can’t take care of themselves. Sometimes you see the poor souls catatonic and drooling and will probably succumb to exposure or some such if the weather turns bad.
I just described a large percentage of the homeless people that people in San Francisco encounter every day (at least if you live/work downtown).
My point is that when you’re around homeless people a lot you tend to get hardened to seeing people in varying degrees of “in need of assistance” or “in need medical help”.
For the record if I was in the OP’s position (and I have encountered similar things in my time in living in SF) I would have immediately called or brought it to the attention of a police officer. I would not have approached the man, I would have no idea if they were dangerous or on drugs or crazy etc…
[/QUOTE]
I think it would depend on the degree of urgency in the person’s apparent level of distress. It’s one thing they’re just wandering around with schizo affective disorder or aphasia or some other mental illness that just makes them appear crazy. There are tons of those and while they may not be able to function in any “normal” society (as relates to what’s normal to them) most of them can seem to survive to one degree or another. Certainly they could use help and treatment, but AFAIK there aren’t many (any?) places in North America (or most of the rest of the developed world) that can legally detain, commit or administer treatment of any kind to a mentally ill person against their will if it is deemed that their illness does not pose a significant threat to themselves or others.
Now, if a homeless man (or anyone, really) is on the ground convulsing or appearing to be passed out or dead in any setting where it would strike me as unusual (the middle of the sidewalk, someone’s lawn, or anywhere you don’t usually find people in positions people don’t usually assume voluntarily) then I’d certainly err on the side of caution and dial 911. At worst I’ll have inconvenienced someone, maybe even annoyed them. To that I say, too damn bad. Far better that I piss someone off and accomplish nothing than do nothing and allow someone to die. I don’t have to try and move them – hell, having no medical training whatsoever I wouldn’t dare for fear that I’d do more harm than good – I just have to get in touch with those who do have the training and can ascertain the person’s condition and take appropriate action.
By way of a brief background, I grew up in Toronto, Ontario. I spent a great deal of time in the heart of the downtown core, so I’ve had lots of time to become inured to the presence of homeless on the streets. This is a separate issue, though, as we’re not talking about stopping to offer a handout. We’re talking about stopping to help out someone who may very well be in some kind of serious distress requiring medical assistance. This doesn’t (or anyway shouldn’t) require that one first evaluate their place in society before deciding on what course of action to take.