I was reading some Wikipedia articles about Lake Chad and how they have a plan to divert the Ubangi River into Lake Chad cause it’s shrinking.
I’ve also read about a plan to divert some rivers that flow north into the artic into the Aral Sea or the Caspian Sea to help with pollution and shrinking.
I also see where they want to divert the a river or make a new canal into the Salton Sea (this would make it less Salty for some reason).
My question is have they ever actually diverted a river. I see the Salton Sea was actually created by a man made accident, that diverted the Colorado River from the Gulf of California, into a dry desert sink.
I don’t mean “accidental” river diversions caused by floods or earthquakes or hurricanes or other natural phenomenons. I mean actually changed the course of the river other than just build a damn to make a lake behind it.
The Chicago River originally flowed into Lake Michigan. Because of the huge amount of sanitary pollution from the city of Chicago, the river and lower Lake Michigan had become a cesspool. The solution was to reverse the flow and draw clean water out of Lake Michigan and flush it through the city and down to the Gulf of Mexico.
The Atchafalaya River has been mostly diverted into the Mississippi. Left to its own devices, the Atchafalaya would now be the main channel of the river, but the Old River Control Structure diverts most (70%) of the water into the Mississippi and only (30%) gets into the Atchafalaya. Without it, the proportions of river flow would likely be reversed.
At least one small tributary of the Kennebec River in Maine was reversed in the 19th century to flow into the Penobscot, to facilitate log-driving. I don’t remember the name of the river. That was possible because it was close to the divide between the two basins. All they had to do was to build a dam high enough to make the water spill over into the Penobscot drainage basin.
The Turia River which used to run through the centre of Valencia in Spain was diverted in the 1950’s. This was because of flooding and damage to the city that used to occur on a regular basis. The Turia now runs to the west of the city and its original river-bed is now a 4 mile-long park bisecting the city.
Drat! **dtilque **beat me to the Atchafalaya/Mississippi River one. I have a real fondness for that, as I used it once to win a ‘what would you do if you were a terrorist’ game some friends and I played back in the 80’s. After I explained what the river control structure was, and the likely outcome of blowing it to Kingdom Come, I won by acclaim. By the way, dtilque, that’s a totally cool website, thanks for the link.
Thanks for the good link and, as you’re probably aware, John McPhee devotes one third of his most excellent book, The Control of Nature, to this very subject.
So do you want diverted, but make it to the original destination, or only diverted and now end up exiting into a different body of water? The United States is full of channel diversions for stretches of river that join to the old bed a bit further down.
There’s been enough water diverted from the California Delta by aqueduct that the San Joaquin River will occasionally flow backwards. It’s also dry for stretches.
The website of the Department maintaining the diversion is here There were plans to build a peripheral canal to bring water from the Sacramento River around the Delta to the pumps, but that was voted down. The Sac still flows into the delta relatively unmolested.
So, yeah, engineers have been diverting water for ages and got up to diverting whole rivers worth of it quite some time ago.
Huge areas of the Western Slope of Colorado have been diverted through tunnels to bring water to the cities of the Front Range. The ‘Continental Divide’ has been moved west by as much as fifty miles.
A note about what can happen when rivers are diverted. We flew over a river in Botswana - or rather where a river HAD been - that had been diverted by nature through seismic activity. I can’t recall the name of it, but someone will pop in with it, I’m sure. Anyhoo, even though the riverbed is now just a place where grasses grow, and has been that way for a very long time, the migrating herds still show up there every year expecting it to be a watering source. Mucking around with nature, even when nature does it, is a bad idea and has been proven so since…well…forever.
The Okavango? They’ve recently seen that some of the faint arm extensions of the African rift periodically produce small seismic events that can cause a few meters of uplift or subsidence but that in such a naturally flat area that can have profound effects on the natural drainage patterns of the delta.
It certainly could be, and that’s what came to mind right away, as we were heading to a camp on the Okavango; but somewhere in the dark recesses of my mind, I’m thinking it may be a different river. No matter.