So the OP starts by lying about the basic facts of the issue, this is good.
Then Damuri, after his admission that he’s a reflexive anti-Israeli bigot (which is my fault, of course) who has to fight not to simply shoehorn any new information into his “I hate Israel!” narrative, spews:
Of course, the actual facts are that, in Israel, it’s a crime to get sex by lying about who you are. If you say you’re a movie star and you’re not, if you say you’re an astronaut and you’re not, if you say you’re a millionaire and you’re not, if you say you’re a certain religion and you’re not. And, lo and behold, he twists that into “ZOMG! You can’t lie about who you are in order to get sex??? APARTHEID!!!”
Sigh.
My, how quickly your morals shift Dio (but we already knew that). Yes, the reference to a “serious romantic relationship” is one that might result in the conception of a child. An “unbearable price” might very well be the birth of a child to someone who a woman wouldn’t have consented to bear children with if she’d known his true identity. Of course, I’m sure your sliding moral scale will slip back to some other loopy value later, and you won’t be advocating that it’s totally cool to lie to women and potentially impregnate them. This is just a ‘special’ situation.
But for this ‘special’ situation, lying to a woman to get her into a situation where children might result, and the woman objecting that you used false pretenses to get her into bed is totalllly like Jim Crow. Exactly like Jim Crow, actually. identical.
Yes, as it’s been made against Jews who were impersonating various professions to which they did not belong.
Finding out the facts before you bluster on about Jim Crow style racism is hard.