Which is stupid enough, but no, you’re still lying. You made specific claims as to specific responses to mere “disagreements over anything related to Israel”.
You simply made that up.
Your feigned non-comprehension over why “You do X, Y and Z in response to A, B and C” is a factual claim where as “I do not like how you post” is an opinion is, shall we say, unimpressive.
You are rather obviously trolling. You started by lying about me, since I pointed out you were lying, you get to claim that, gee, isn’t it awful, I just called you a liar! Why, that proves your argument (and was, of course, the point behind your troll whereby you lied about me simply to bait me into calling you out).
You’re also lying about how I called you a bigot, naturally so you can troll on that point too and crow about how, (zounds!) I pointed out that you’re lying and I didn’t call you a bigot.
Just a bit of standard bullshit that gets tossed around in these debates. The only claim more laughable than the lie that nobody can criticize Israel without being called a racist/bigot/whatever is the claim that nobody who criticizes Israel does so out of bigotry/racism/whatever.
And, of course, showing what kind of a person you are, you ignored the lie in the OP that I pointed out (no, nobody was arrested and jailed for their nationality, that was made up) and instead spewed your bullshit about how it was just horrible that I pointed out that it was a lie. And you ignored that the two people in this thread who I’ve called bigots are:
- a guy who has simply made up some bullshit about “Jim Crow” and invented an imaginary situation which he claims proves his hatred of a nationality, but which he can’t cite and won’t cite because it’s fictional. One hopes that your stupidity and malice is situational and you’re not always this dense.
It’s telling that if it wasn’t Dio voicing his anti-Israel bigotry, but something like “[black people] can be counted on to do [negative thing], and I don’t have to prove this because, after all, everybody knows that [black people] are bad.” then of course people would object.
But when it’s “[Israelis] can be counted on to [totally ignore their own laws if an Arab Israeli is wronged] and I don’t have to prove this because, after all, everybody knows that [Israelis] are bad.” well, how dare anybody call that bigotry!
- a guy who admitted that his instinctual reaction to any new information is to try to fit it into a narrative that seeks to demonize a national group.
Again, it’s telling that it wouldn’t fly if he said “I don’t think I used to be so knee-jerk [against gays] but [people who defend gays] are turning me into someone who is instinctualy anti-gay. I don’t spend time slowly digesting new facts into my gestalt of what is going on [with the gay community], instead I find myself trying to figure out how new facts can be incorporated into a narrative against [gays] and I have to make a conscious effort to retain objectivity and that really bothers me. I don’t think this was the case before I encountered [people who defend gays].”
But if it’s about how someone shows that kind of behavior towards Israel why, it’s just awful to point out that it’s bigotry.
So, aside from the fact that I’m correct and you’re being a little bitch, yah, bangup job there Giraffe.