Robert Portman for VP?

He’s more conservative than Romney, which will round out the ticket. He appears to be popular in Ohio which may help win this crucial swing state. He’s not Catholic like Ryan, though I’m not sure why some people find this to be an issue. And more personable than Tim Pawlenty.

What would some negatives be for Portman as compared to Pawlenty, Ryan, or Daniels?

Rats, I misread this and thought you said Natalie Portman for VP. We missed the chance to elect a hot babe for veep last time around, and this time, the hot babe would be smarter than a walnut.

I think he’s overall one of the better VP picks-although it may be nice to hire someone with foreign policy experience. Although OTOH the ticket will be a bit dry maybe its a good thing after 2008.

He’s said to be one of the finalists along with Pawlenty. I don’t know much about him. I think Daniels is out of the running, or dropped out, because he agreed to become president of Purdue next year. It’s not an unbreakable commitment but he probably would not have made it if he expected to be considered for a place on the ticket (or wanted to be considered).

As long as it loses, the country wins.

W’s budget director for VP? Would Mitt really go there?

That’s really the only obvious negative (besides the blandness). Portman was inextricably tied to both Presidents Bush.

The aforementioned lack of FP experience doesn’t help, but I’m not sure how much it hurts. Romney can’t really use FP as a weapon in the campaign anyways (unless something flares up between now and Nov).

Despite having easily won election to the Senate in 2010 over a tired old Dem, Portman’s still not all that well-known here. He might make a little difference in carrying Ohio, but couldn’t deliver the state, as such. He is pretty bland. He also would already (as would just about any public officeholder these days) have released a lot more of his past taxes than Romney has, which will (I hope) lead to the question, “Why do we know more about your running mate’s taxes than we do about yours, Mr. Romney?”

Who?

All I know about this guy is that his last name contains in it the name of a type of red wine (which I do not personally care for). So based on this limited amount of knowledge; I’d never vote for the guy and don’t much like him.

I wouldn’t say he’s popular. I mean, he’s not unpopular either, but people just have no idea who he is:

He won by a large margin in 2010, but beating Lee Fisher isn’t exactly a huge accomplishment. Lots of people have done it.

Quite a bit smarter!

For those who want to know more about Sen. Portman: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Portman

Nothing like having a near unknown being a heart-beat away…good thinking.

Get a few Democrats to say in strategically placed ads that they could work with him because he is willing to cooperate with them, and the Teapers will have a shit fit.

The guy’s been in one political office or another since the first Bush administration. Ohio voters may not be terribly familiar with his record, but he has a pretty long record to find out about if people are interested (as they presumably will be if he is the VP nom). He’s hardly an “unknown”.

No, he’s not unknown. But even here in Ohio, he’s hardly a household name. So if part of the strategy of picking him is the hope of picking up a significant number of Ohio votes, I don’t see him being a big plus.

People in Ohio don’t know who their United States Senator is?

I’d like to see a Jindal/Romney ticket, but that’s just me.

I think that lots of people don’t know who their US Senators are - I, for one, don’t know who my two representatives are. Not that they merit attention for whatever sleaziness they have probably been up to …

How could you have 2 Representatives?:confused: Or did you mean senators?

I’m sure some do. I’m also sure many don’t. I used to work on Capitol Hill (for an earlier Senator from Ohio), and when I met non-Hillies, I was often surprised to discover how little they knew or cared about their representatives in Congress. That was more than 25 years ago, but I doubt it’s changed that much. We hear a lot of noise from strong partisans on both sides, but they’re really just a loud minority. It’s the quiet, mostly apathetic majority that everyone’s trying to reach.