I’m a professional cameraman, perhaps I can shed a bit of accurate light here.
The hand-held cameras used inside of the ring during the in-between, before and after fight shots as well as being used just outside of the ring during the fight sequences were high definition video cameras. The rest of the film was shot with 35mm cameras supplied by Clairmont Camera in Los Angeles. ( No, it was most definitely not shot in Panavision )
It is unarguable that some of the hottest films of the year were not shot in film, but rather in High Definition. ( “Superman Returns”, etc. ).
The reason they jump out at you is because when cut right up against film footage, they have ( amongst other things ) different contrast ratios, knee, resolution and so on. Even though those shots were captured well and edited into the footage with no generational loss, the shots do jump out at the eye.
I saw the film last night, but will talk about that in the thread about the film.
What Walloon said about the shutter is essentially accurate. Film cameras either use a 180* half-circle shutter or a “butterfly” shutter that runs 90* segments separated by 90* of air. The 180 degree spinning shutter looks a lot like this, while it is not a traditional camera it may well be the largest spinning mirrored shutter every built ! OTOH, this close-up of an Arriflex 16mm film camera port ( scroll down to the image just above " Show a Friend " ) shows the “butterfly” shutter configuration I mentioned. Four 90* areas. Two are empty, two have mirrors. The ring spins in conjunction with the film passing through the gate.
In Saving Private Ryan, a variety of techniques were used to achieve the results we all saw- notably altering the shutter, shifting the film speed slightly, removing the registration pin from the gate of the cameras and stripping the prime lenses of their multi-coating. The multi-coating developed after WWII ( actually, into the 1960’s ) allowed for a more clear color rendering, better contrast and a more robust control over those pesky flares. Since the footage looked quite different before the advent of multi-coated lenses, stripping them was another item in the ( ahem ) arsenal.
Panavision stripped the lenses before shooting started. Production then paid to have the front elements re-coated after filming wrapped. Panavision equipment cannot be purchased anywhere on the planet, it is rented or leased long-term. So, in the rental agreement was the deal to strip them, and then re-coat them. Considering the amount of explosives used, I wouldn’t be surprised if the odd front element were nicked here and there, despite the no-doubt conscientious use of optical flats in front to protec them. -shrug- The cost of doing business.
Cartooniverse, Founding member of the Steadicam Operators’ Association, IATSE 600, IBEW 1212 and NABET 16.