Romney "No one's ever asked to see my birth certificate"

All right then, I’ll rephrase in a way that stays on topic:

If we can read between the lines of one candidate’s statement, then it is fair to read between the lines of another’s, even if it contradicts what the candidate actually literally SAID.

The term “special relationship” goes back to Churchill, and it has been specifically the subject of discussion in the UK and here. Obama has also praised the “shared history and heritage” of the countries. If the use of “Anglo-Saxon” by the Romney advisor, instead of “English” by Obama is what convinced, I think that’s a pretty narrow distinction.

I’ll treat this as if it had been on topic: in what way did my post contradict what Romney said?

I’m entirely familiar with the term.

Did Obama say that someone else didn’t understand the relationship? And “Anglo-Saxon” and “English” don’t mean the same thing. “English” isn’t a common synonym for white, and “Anglo-Saxon” is.

<Insane Birther>

It is obviously photoshopped - you can tell from the pixels. And I note that it was issued in 2012. 2012! Who is he trying to kid? His father was born in Mexico, so that makes Romney non-eligible.
It’s not an original certificate. Where’s the original? It’s not even a real long-form birth certificate, it’s a certificate of live birth. That’s not the same.

Why does he not release the original? Why did he release this 2012, made up, forgery?
Was he actually born in Mexico? Are his children anchor babies?

I think that someone should look into where “Mitt Romney” (aka Manuel Rodriguez) was actually born. Is there a birth notice in a 1947 newspaper? Affidavits from a doctor or nurse in attendance? No? Why not? What does he have to hide?

</IB>

Fifteen minutes earlier…

Let me know when you’ve got your story straight.

You can race-bait without being a racist. I don’t think Bush the Smarter was a racist because of the Willie Horton ad, but he was race-baiting.

How do you read Romney’s comment as *contradicting *the birthers instead of endorsing them? :dubious: How *can *you?

One can race bait without being a racist, if one thinks such a tactic will serve a purpose. Which it appears Romney does.

In fact, knowing what you’re doing makes it easier to do well.

The whole ‘show your birth certificate’ nonsense is a prime example of things Mr. Romney should avoid invoking.

And as an Anglo-American (though probably not Saxon), I am just a wee bit perturbed by the whole thing.

All he said was that he and his wife were born in Michigan hospitals, and that it was common knowledge. And a joke about the birth certificate controversy.

In order to read racial dog whistles into it, you have to make some assumptions. Something which conservatives get criticized for doing. And called ignorant, dishonest, stupid…

This contains much win.

Sorry, but there is no innocent explanation. Either Mitt is a batshit-crazy birther (which I don’t believe), or he wants to stoke the hatred of those that are.

You mean, a joke about a controversy that is entirely race-related?

Let’s say that there was a “controversy” about Obama eating watermelon. If Romney stood up and said, “Nyuck, nyuck, we don’t eat watermelon!” would you be able to see the racial impact of that statement?

Romney is saying that he’s a white guy, an obvious American. No one would ask him for his birth certificate because golly, he’s just so obviously American, unlike “that one.”

The Romney campaign’s own reaction to criticism over this joke over the next few days will give us a pretty good idea whether it was really an “off-the-cuff joke”, or a dog-whistle meant to gain support.

Besides, what possible purpose can race baiting serve? are people unfamiliar with the President’s heritage?

Are you kidding me?

If it’s for political purposes, it’s calculated to get the racists out to vote- so that they think Romney is really on their side.

It’s quite disturbing the degree to which some people view everything through this prism of racism.

Romney’s joke had nothing to do with race. Period.

I don’t automatically think Mitt put this out to race-bait (though he might have)- because I think Mitt is just a bad politician, a bad campaigner, and someone who has bad political instincts. It might just be a stupid joke- like his “who let the dogs out” moment.

Basically, incompetence may explain this one- rather than maliciousness.

Or maybe not. I think the campaign’s own reaction to the controversy will be telling.