George. Edward. Albert.
Unlikely Richard. Henry. Stephan, James, John
My preference: Stephan John
Thomas Richard Harold.
I like Stephen (although I’ve known Stephans, I just lie the spelling of Stephen better). There already was one, so there is a little history. There are no close relatives with that name, so he would be the only one, and it sounds nice.
I want Richard, but I’m not going to get it.
There won’t be a John in it anywhere, I’ll guarantee.
Usually there are 4 names. It wouldn’t surprise me if the names Michael and Charles (the grandfathers) are present, but not the first name. So I can see something like Albert Michael George Charles.
David won’t be among them. King Edward VIII and all that.
Francis will be there in honor of Diana Frances. I think Alexander Francis Michael Charles.
The baby will be named Michael Francis. (after Kate’s dad)
It would be a nice gesture to make her parents feel included in the royal household.
They’re both nice names, but for a second son or for middle names.
I think they need traditional Royal names for a first, and there are a lot to choose from.
I think they should name him Sighs. Prince Sighs.
That way, if he ever becomes King . . .
We’ll find out soon, but now we know it’s a boy, wanna guess his name?
I’m going with George, after his great-grandfather.
Bob (short for Kate).
ethelred.
Yes! Yes! Yes!
And I hope he goes down in history as “King Bob, the Regular Guy” or just “King Bob, the Regular.”
I’m hoping for a James. Or a Mary.
Geoffrey.
Charles George Albert Francis
Kong. What better name for a King? 
Kong
Ipality
Prince Ipality [sic]