I am confused. My statement that I live in a non-wealthy area and have conservative friends/family would seem to jibe with your statement that non-wealthy areas tend to run conservative. (And in fact, the town I grew up in borders on Appalachia, has been economically depressed for decades, and is as red as red could be, politically. The urban area I live in now is more liberal-leaning, but I still have a lot of friends from home.)
Since July 2011, the number of Federal workers in DC has gone down by about 10%, while private sector employment has risen by about 5%. Cite. Job growth is highest in the hospitality industry.
Since we’re talking about the time period of the recession which started in 2008 I don’t know why you are posting a cite that just counts since July of 2011.
Since it’s easy to show that you’re wrong, I don’t waste too much time digging up precise cites that suit every aspect of your assertions. I’m providing cites more for the benefit of other posters here so that they will recognize your mistakes, rather than as an attempt to get you to change your mind.
aruvqan didn’t put it like I would have but I think we have all known people with Masters and PhDs who are, while smart, only knowledgeable about an incredibly narrow slice of the universe.
So far as the question of what degree of mistake Art Laffer made at any given point, I don’t care. I’m just pointing out that it’s not nuts to believe he made any serious error just because he’s accomplished at something else.
But it’s not something else. He’s an accomplished in both economics and government. That would lead me to think he knows something so basic as Medicare being a government program.
So you’re okay with this precedent? It won’t bother you if the Democrats refuse to pass an appropriations bill that includes funding for all the duly passed legislation they dislike?
On point: I have a relative who is a highly ranked chemist for the government. He knows, because of his training, that evolution is real. But because he’s so utterly in the RW Media, he wants creationism taught in high school. He has trouble and blusters if you try to pin him down on why.
So because of his ideological push, he’s supporting something he knows isn’t true. Because everyone he idolizes says the words. It’s possible to, in the moment, just parrot the party line when you know better, because it is very important to you.
I suspect that Laffer is similar. Yeah, in a paper he’d never suggest that Medicare is private, but when his visceral brain is in charge, he just regurgitates arguments he hears around the campfire.