Stupid question alert: what would the invading Russians want with Chernobyl? If I understand correctly, nuclear power plant fuel and waste products aren’t suited to be converted into weapons.
A commenter or two has said that Chernobyl is, in effect, the world’s largest suicide vest (penetrating the concrete sarcophagus could devastate much of Eurasia); therefore, it’s important to have control over it.
This is in addition to the pure logistics piece (it was on our way).
Yeah. I was thinking that several of the reactors were still online, but they had all been decommissioned in the early 2000’s. So, most logical reason I’ve seen is it was simply on the way logistically to where they wanted to go, and these days the danger of going through the area is fairly minimal, as long as you don’t actually try and go into the reactor area. The roads still seemed to be in fairly good shape, at least the last time I saw a special on someone going into the area, so that also helps a lot.
I would guess that, even then, NATO would try hard to brush it off and move on as a “it was an accident” thing, and would accept apologies and compensation if Russia offered it, and try to get everyone to move on. NATO is not eager to invoke Article 5 at all.
You’d have to really poke NATO, on purpose, for them to invoke it.
I think that there is a new power plant in the area, so probably. It’s not nuclear, though can’t recall what it is. I just remember someone mentioning that to me.
Just one missile? And just randomly hitting somewhere in Poland? Yeah, they wouldn’t invoke article 5 for that. If, say, a couple dozen ‘accidentally’ hit several key sites in Poland though…
Why do people insist on doing this fake video stuff? Every time there is some kind of dramatic news event some joker copies an old video or photo from some similar event.
Yeah, that would be great. And yeah, it’s hard to believe. I’ve heard reports of Ukrainians taking out tanks and helicopters, but none of the reports seem verified, at least not when I was looking earlier. It’s hard to gauge how well…or poorly…Ukraine is doing at this point. But given the disparity in forces, it’s hard to see Ukraine doing that well, especially considering the difference in equipment and armaments.
What counts towards ace? I saw a picture of a supposedly downed Ukrainian plane, it looked to be some sort of transport. So while it’s a military plane it probably only has defensive measures (flares, chaff) & therefore wasn’t able to engage in aerial combat. I’m guessing that doesn’t count???
I doubt that there is a widespread successful checking of the advance, after all, even both Gulf Wars, thorough triumphs of the American military, also had over a hundred casualties and/or vehicle losses. These few inevitable losses by Russia could definitely be overemphasized by Ukraine if they wished to. Then again, it’s possible that it’s true, and I surely hope that it is.
A collection of Tweets from Ukraine. Some are difficult to read. This could easily be me or my best friend. I’m just lucky that my ancestors immigrated from Europe.