I recently bought an item from CostCo’s website. The item was listed at $300, but included an “$80 manufacturer’s savings,” so the final price ends up being $220. Sort of. In the end, CostCo’s website charged me sales tax on the full $300, and then deducted the $80. It sure looks to me like I’m paying about $5 more in sales tax than I should be.
After a bit of Googling, I found this class action lawsuit against CostCo, accusing them of collecting excess sales taxes similar to the way I described. The interesting thing is that the specific issue in that lawsuit was sales for which CostCo didn’t actually receive any rebate/savings money from the manufacturer – IOW, the only money that changed hands was from the consumer to CostCo, and so the only sales tax that should have been paid was for the net amount of that sale.
I’m familiar with the old-school rebate in which you buy an item for X*(1+Y) dollars (where X is the sticker price and Y is the sales tax rate), and then mail some paperwork to the manufacturer and receive Z dollars back (where Z<X). You don’t get reimbursed for the sales tax you paid on those Z dollars. It’s stupid, but yeah, I get it, I paid x dollars when I bought it, so I pay sales tax on that amount, and the rebate is a separate issue. But what about the purchase I described in the first paragraph above, i.e. a transaction during which those Z dollars never move to/from the customer’s wallet in the first place? Am I really supposed to be paying sales tax on those Z dollars then? Does it really matter whether Z dollars moves from the manufacturer to the vendor?