Well customers have to translate into sales. More importantly they have to translate into the correct items.
I’ll give you an example. In Chicago, where I live, I can always find milk for $1.99/gallon or eggs for 99¢ a dozen. One week it’ll be Walgreens, the next CVS, the next a grocer, or even 7-11.
The point is these stores expect you to come in for the cheap milk or eggs and buy something else while you’re there.
If every customer was like me, go into the store and by only the milk, the stores would be very upset.
I really think in this case Walmart is simply using the weak economy to weed out the dead wood.
Think of your own company and ask yourself, who in your company could you get along without? Then ask yourself, why don’t they fire them?
Usually companies want a good excuse to fire people. This economy makes a good opportunity to do the weeding.
If you look at the article you see the following
Then you see:
Then you see
Now let’s do the math:
In a horrible economy that isn’t getting any better do you really need 1,200 people to RECRUIT someone? I would guess not. Walmart probaly has thousands of applicatons on file already and more coming in daily. You see people are coming to Walmart, they don’t need to go to them.
So yeah that’s weeding out deadwood from a time when Walmart had to go after talent.
Now 10,000 workers who showcase products? Offer food samples?
Since these are partime workers mostly it makes sense to let them go. In tough times people are less likely to be persuaded so why bother trying.
Why keep deadwood on? I never understood this about companies.