Sarah Palin takes no responsibility for the Tucson shootings? Really?

We’re not allowed dick-jokes in The Pit?

Listen, you’re the one who came in with the ‘this is the real truth and I don’t have to prove it because you’ll just be argue with me’ bullshit.

Either put up or deal with the insults, however juvenile they be.

Come on - at least give us a Weathermen cite from 1969 or something.

I read: Please explain what responsibility Palin bears for a psychotic nutball showing up a Congressional photo-op at a grocery store.

Think before you read. Have you learned nothing about the significance of grammar?

I’m sorry, I don’t think this lends itself to argument. As evidenced by the tortured convoluted distinctions being made here. So I’m not going to argue it. You want to think that means you win by default, that’s fine. My point was made to those who would consider it.

I have no problem with it. But if you’re going to make dick jokes, don’t complain if others make equally insipid retorts.

Fine. Take your ball and go home, you pussy.

What struck me about Palin’s statement is the sheer artistry of it. The way she turns it back around against anyone criticizing her. From her email to Glenn Beck (no echo chamber there, so don’t even think that).

That’s just absolutely brilliant. She must’ve paid good money to have someone write that for her, or at least clean it up for her. The reference to “our children” is simplistic enough for her, but the rest is almost poetic. It’s like verbal judo for morons.

Hold the wedding. Do we know that this nut case ever even saw the so called “Cross-Hair, target’s”? One of you know-it all’s must have some inside info. on this. May I hear it?

Ah yes. The absolute proof defense. Unless you can go into his browser history and prove that he visited her website or give a quote where he says that Sarah was his inspiration in all things, then none of this counts.

Honestly I think you’ve got them with that one.

must protect my tribe

She was shot. What other proof could you possibly want before you start pinning incitement of murder on people. Something substantial?

Crosshairs are parts of gunsights and Clinton was impeached over a blowjob. Never let em spin that kind of thing.

Conservative rhetoric is annoying and can bring out the irrationals in any society. But this guy??

Jared seems to be an IED just waiting to explode someday. What an asshole. Even if he has 3 autographed copies of Palin’s book at his abode does not mean she wanted this to happen. All Palin is good at is being a celebrity and that’s all. jared is a rambling idiot with some type of mental disorder. The Cookie Monster could’ve influenced his attack just as easily as Palin or Bachmann or many others. Fucking freak of nature is what this nutcase is.

Hopefully, all rhetoric that is conservative or liberal can be put aside for a change.

I disagree; this is about Palin et al pretending they didn’t do things they did.

You know what cracks me up? We’ve all heard and seen the macho posturing. Inbred retards carrying their cute little guns to Teabagger meetings, calls for second amendment solutions, cold dead hands crap, talk about kicking the shit out of whoever, blood of tyrants yada yada yada.

Now what? Scurrying around hollering “no we are nice and would never say such horrible things and mean it”.

Bullshit. Fucking cowards. Tell you what. Either you mean it or you don’t. If you mean it, stand by it. If you don’t then shut the fuck up.

Regardless and unrelated to the shootings that already happened, this phony macho bullshit makes me want to puke.

As for the shooter, to hell with him. have a nice little trial and then lock his ass up forever. No psych treatment, no “miraculous cure”, just locked away forever and forgotten. What’s that French word for a pit in the floor, the one you toss them in and forget? Oubliette?

Yeah, why can’t those inbred retards participate in reasoned political discourse like the rest of us?

Because nobody will let them bring their banjos to rallies. Not after what happened the last time.

Maybe it’s the map you linked to from the DLC doesn’t have any people’s names listed as being targeted. You did notice that they only show states, right? Not people?

No, that’s a lie. Clicking on the bullseyes (of the DLC map) does nothing.

So, it’s OK to use targets as long as you don’t have any names? I’m just trying to understand the rules…

As stated earlier, the DLC map targets specific states in a presidential election - there wouldn’t BE any names to attach to it. Target a state - fine. Target a specific person with crosshairs? Slightly different, don’t you think?