What trouble me is that Tony seems already to have made up his mind on an issue that has not yet been presented to his court. And surely there will be First Amendment issues presented to the court again, the most likely candidate being the California/Pledge of Allegiance issue. Regarding the California ruling,
Legislation should be the mechanism by which religion is constrained in our society. Did I misunderstand Mr. Scalia? Wouldn’t that give way to a “majority rules” situation with regard to religion in politics?