[QUOTE]
Thank you I learned something. Was it GAlileo who concieved of flight long before the Wright brothers and Kitty Hawk?
I see. Someone would have to concieve of the existance of this unseen force before there would be any need to invent a solar cell. Like radio waves or our TV signal.
I agree with you on this point. In fact , we are compelled to believe something, and those beliefs reflect in our choices.
That particular belief doesn’t make the world better. It is negative energy.
ISn’t science responsible for global warming? One thing science has done is to help dispell some of the religous myths. I see the search for truth in science and spiritual as parallel. Different labs. Both have created monsters.
If God is not then everything else is not as well since God is the unseen force that binds everything together. {just a theory}
If God is then we cannot make things better while denying that truth.
And yet these spiritual scientists insist it was God. Gandhi actually tells of hearing the voice of God. {That crazy bastard} If a scientist tells me of the results of his experiment how do I verify or negate those findings?
Here again I agree to a point. I believe truth , scientific and spiritual, logic and reason are completely compatible. the discovery of truth hasn’t progressed as much as our egos would like to think. I too am frustrated by those who claim some commitment to the truth, and then reufse to acknowledge the evidence before them and continue to embrace tradition and myth.
it is serving the search for truth to toss out certain concepts of God but not every concept of God. Do we look at the world and say. Hooray for science, it certainly has made things a lot better? I believe the search for truth on both fronts is imperative.