Okay - I feel physically ill after looking at my team. I was an auction virgin, but I’d done plenty of research. I’m going to walk through my method, and explain where things went terribly, terribly wrong.
In an auction, you need to do to things to prepare. Predict every single player that will be drafted (in this case, 300), and spend every single dollar allotted in the auction ($4,000). So I went through cheatsheets, selecting the top 300 players. I took 30 quarterbacks,defenses and kickers (thinking some people would still take backups), and then the rest of the RB/WR/TEs I could find. So far, so good. Then I started alloting points. I could do one of two things: (1): Double everyone’s price from a 10-team league auction cheatsheet or (2): Distribute the funds on a steeper curve. I went with a little of both.
What happened was ©: everyone freaks out about high prices, sticks with a 10- or 12-team auction mindset, and spends the remaining money way down the line on guys I had pegged at $1. Of course, looking back, that should have been obvious. Fantasy teams are made in the mid- to late-rounds, especially this league. As such, I ended up with, basically, a 4 player team.
My specific draft strategy was to take 1 stud RB, 3 solid WRs, and spend $10 on a QB. Let’s see what happened… (I’d like to mention all projected values I had for everyone, but I don’t have it in front of me. I’ll guess.)
**1. (1) Chris Johnson (Ten - RB) $85: **Blam. I had CJ projected at a $115 value, and I just KNEW people would look back to this around Pick #75 and lament and gnash their teeth. How foolish everyone would feel! Holy mother of God…
**2. (4) Drew Brees (NO - QB) $45: **On one hand, this isn’t terrible - other top QBs went for high prices as well. On the other hand, Kevin Kolb went for $14… I believe I had Brees pegged around $85 or so.
3. (14) Brandon Marshall (Mia - WR) $35: WRs were going pretty low (from my perspective), and I wanted a good one. Looking at the list, $35 isn’t too bad - but I probably could have used that money getting 2 mid-round WRs to actually start… My value for Marshall was around $50.
4. (91) Chad Ochocinco (Cin - WR) $22: And thus ends my draft - it was here when I realized things had gone horribly, horribly wrong. Prices were starting to rise for the mid-draft players, and I was about to be outside-looking-in as everyone flush with cash started spending money. I needed one more piece to stay competitive, and I needed one fast. I don’t mind Ochocinco, but his situation isn’t ideal (nor is his age).
5. (225) Matt Hasselbeck (Sea - QB) $1: Wow, a backup QB! I didn’t have one of those last year…
**6. (239) James Davis (Cle - RB) $3: **Apparently has about a 10% chance to get the starting gig. I’ll take 10% of the carries at this point.
7. (257) Jerious Norwood (Atl - RB) $1: I figure grabbing handcuffs isn’t a terrible idea, especially with guys who could be goalline backs.
**8. (269) Rashad Jennings (Jac - RB) $1: **This pick could actually really pay off. I believe MJD’s knee isn’t a huge concern, but it is still a concern (especially in a league this friggin’ huge).
**9. (279) Lance Moore (NO - WR) $1: **Another pick I’m pretty happy about. Moore doesn’t have a great chance at the WR3 job in NO, but he can start in the slot for me any day!
**10. (287) Leonard Weaver (Phi - RB) $1: **A fullback in the NFL? What is this, 1996? I’d probably like this pick better if Westbrook was still around.
**11. (291) Brandon Lloyd (Den - WR) $1: **I see a lot of depth charts with him actually starting. Certainly that can’t be right. I take this Demaryius Thomas cat took the job?
**12. (293) Atlanta (Atl - DEF) $1: **Best available.
13. (295) Courtney Roby (NO - WR) $1: Who? He’s a return guy. Let’s see if it pans out.
**14. (297) Kevin Faulk (NE - RB) $1: **No one knows who gets the ball in NE. Faulk is currently listed at #4. I think that means he gets to start every 4th game…
**15. (299) Donald Lee (GB - TE) $1: **A #2 TE as my #1. Lee gets a surprising amount of targets even with Finley on the field. Not any sleepers left, so I’ll go with consistent (if tiny) production.