Update on BMW’s notso hotso system now that I’m comfortable (enough) with it.
Coming up on stopped traffic ahead (e.g. at a traffic light) it really waits to the last moment to brake. I can moderate that a bit by cranking the following distance out to max, then once I see the car has noticed the slowed or stopped vehicle ahead tweaking the following distance back down. But that sorta defeats the purpose of auto-follow; it’s less work (and less nervous for the driver) to simply tap the brakes and take over manually.
While waiting at a light with a vehicle ahead and the light changes and traffic starts to move … Sometimes the car will start moving on its own and other times it needs a nudge of gas pedal or a push on the [resume] button to get it going. That might be mode confusion on my part since its easy to inadvertently disengage the system to standby while sitting there. Or maybe it’s confused rather than me.
Separately, it seems slow to begin moving when it does so automatically. More than once it has started moving just as the car behind starts honking. If it began rolling even slightly as soon as the car ahead did, then gradually build up the spacing that would reassure the driver behind that I / my car are paying attention, not asleep as so many cars / drivers are.
Switching from fore / aft to side / side …
The lane-keeping feature is … sigh … problematic as the kids say.
It’s become evident to me that it’s about 80% “center up on the vehicle close ahead”, and about 20% “see and follow the lane markings”. With a car a couple seconds ahead, my car follows that car just fine. Lane meanders and all. Absent a car ahead, the self-steering will lose track and disengage in nearly every boulevard-sized intersection then take 10+ seconds (feels like an eternity) to regain track and auto-reengage once on the other side. Over and over and over at every half-mile or mile intersection here in the Great Grid.
What’s fun is when the car ahead changes lanes. Initially my car follows the lane change. Then just before it crosses the lane line it changes its mind and returns abruptly towards the lane center. If there’s another car close enough ahead, it gloms onto following that one and the total result is crude, but tolerable. If there’s no car ahead it’ll sort of bounce between the lane lines a couple times before settling down. Or it’ll simply disengage just after making its bid back towards my lane’s center. Reminds me of the kid’s game of unexpectedly throwing something at your friend while shouting “think fast!” just a little too late to get their attention in time to catch it.
If I had to hazard a guess, I’d say the car is using its side cameras to look straight down, or maaaybe 20 feet ahead trying to find lane stripes. It’s sure as heck not looking 100 or 200 feet ahead. It’s like driving looking at your hood ornament (remember those?).
Above 40mph it will perform a lane change on its own on your cue of activating the turn signal. Surprisingly, it does that great. WTF? And it’s aware of what’s in the adjacent lane just ahead, behind, and alongside. So will alarm and refuse to act if it’s concerned about cars in the way. I’m not about to test it, but I suspect it doesn’t look far enough ahead or behind to detect a vehicle in the adjacent lane with a high closure rate; i.e. somebody much slower ahead or coming up fast from behind. Why that part is so good and the rest so crude remains a mystery to me.
Bottom line:
In all, it is useful on the freeways when traffic is flowing freely or is congested. The surface street experience is better when the roads are crowded than when they are not. It really needs a herd to tell it where it belongs both fore / aft and left / right.
It sure as hell isn’t Tesla FSD, much less Waymo. I suppose my overall attitude is it’s like the circus bear walking upright: “The amazing thing isn’t that it’s good at it, but that it can do it at all.”
Maybe the next generation of hardware sensors and software will be better. But I’ll need to buy a 2026 or more likely a 2027 model to find out.