Is there a better way to train/test the systems safely? I don’t think that anyone thinks that there will always be someone waiting attentively to take over.
Humans require a lot of training with someone waiting to take over too. Do you think Driver’s Ed is wasteful and inefficient?
I think they’re at least right in that the cars have all the necessary hardware for that, but the software isn’t even close. In a thread where we struggle to settle on a benchmark, though, and with automakers shifting their own goalposts around (e.g. Waymo’s fair-weather members-only shuttle service) I think it’s good to have that description archived here, as that level of self-driving car is what I envisioned when I started this thread. I think that’s what most people think of when they hear terms like “autopilot.”
Yes but after that driver’s ed student passes his test he requires no further supervision to drive. No so with self-driving cars. Self-driving cars are are like putting a bunch of inexperienced 5 year old driver’s ed students with poor depth perception on the streets, IMO.
Sure it’s a novelty, but if you go out and buy a Tesla, put it in autopilot, be vigilant like you’re supposed to, and take over when it does something stupid you aren’t teaching the car anything. You’re just expected to take over at a moment’s notice to make up for the shortcomings of current technology.
Yep, it almost seems to me that you would have to be MORE diligent to take over at a moments notice. At least when you are driving, you know what you expect yourself to do. Not necessarily so with autopilot.
I look forward to all the contorted arguments that will attempt to inform me that this is not, in fact, a self-driving car and that it is in no way actually on the road.
Can’t drive on main roads, limited to 1 mile, has a “shadow vehicle” in case something goes wrong. Sure it’s an interesting step but you know full well it is not the sort of the the OP was discussing.
This thread is like the Mueller investigation. Incremental progress is made every day but “is he impeached yet/are self-driving cars ubiquitous yet?” remains the crux of the opposition/disbelief.
I heard that 400,000 groceries lined up to put down a $1,000 deposit on it, even though they won’t be able to buy it for several years. It’s going to have to go through “produce hell” to get it to consumers. BOGO coupons not accepted.
About foodstuffs putting deposits down on Bo’s autonomous shopping cart? Let’s just say I was given the inside two scoops and I lapped it up like milk. Sure, that’s a lot of cabbage for the average egg, but that doesn’t make them a sucker. You’re asking me where’s the beef, but someone is bringing home the bacon. If this shopping cart is worth its salt, you don’t need to worry about comments from any nuts on the Internet. The proof is in the pudding, and I trust the cart not to drive like a hot dog.
I’ve completely changed my position after catching up with this thread and reading a few other articles. Six months ago, I would have predicted that there would be a real self-driving car operating without minders over at least a few city-sized areas, either for sale or in real commercial service (taxi fleet or deliveries), by the end of 2024. But, based on what I’m reading, I think the technology is developing too slowly for companies to justify the massive continuing investments in self-driving cars that will be necessary to get them to market. I don’t know if there will ever be self-driving cars, but I don’t think it will come in the next decade, and I think none of the companies trying to be the first to market now will continue to be involved with them by then. Today’s companies will have thrown up their hands after burning barrels full of money on the effort. I think we will hear more about self-driving car companies failing or cancelling their programs in 2019 and 2020 than we will hear about massive milestones in SDCs. I hope I’m wrong.
It operates in a one square mile area. At no more than a few miles per hour. And they have so little faith in it, they have a chase vehicle with an operator who can control it remotely. This is not the self-driving future I envisioned. This is an experiment designed to generate publicity more than a real public roll-out of technology. It will probably go away quietly and without fanfare in the near future.
Who carries the groceries from your trunk?
These articles suggest that Waymo has taken a big step backwards. Waymo used to offer free self-driving rides to 400 consumers. Now they are going to charge them for the same service. Some of the users who thought it free was a great price will drop out, so this is a convenient way of shrinking the test pool without saying as much. These cars still need a minder. Waymo got a lot of headlines when they said they would pilot test fully self driving cars but it seems like few cars actually operated without drivers. This autonomous service launch seems more like the people in charge of the project are trying to appear to have stuck to a 2018 deadline than actually having accomplished it. Maybe without positive headlines suggesting progress ginned up by stunts like this, Alphabet plans to cut off their funding. This is not encouraging.
And then there is this summary:
The outlook for self-driving cars doesn’t look good.