The gist of the plan is right there in the title, but I’ll expound briefly.
After the revolution (which is scheduled for next Thursday, around tea time.) the new powers that be will put me in charge of administering justice. My plan is a simple one. Firstly, I would legalise all so-called victimless crimes, prostitution, drug use etc… Not only would this be (I think) the right thing to do, it would free up jail space for phase two of my plan: The mandatory life imprisonment of all convicted first degree murderers, rapists, and violent child sexual predators in Federal Supermax prisons without the merest scintilla of a possibility of parole, ever.
This is the aspect of the plan I want to discuss. Frankly, I can’t understand why we don’t do this already. As far as I’m concerned, murderers, rapists, and violent pedophiles have basically chosen to evict themselves from the human race. To me, a convicted murderer is simply not an object of my moral concern. I’d care more about a dog in the street than I would about such a person. Furthermore, given that support for capital punishment, 3 strike laws, and longer sentences remains high, I’m willing to wager that this sentiment is shared by a majority of the population.
In the case of murderers, I basically think that for every day their victims remain dead, they should remain in prison. They have forfeited their right to expect anything more than that which is needed to sustain them in the short term.
In the case of rapists and pedophiles, their crimes are crimes of compulsion, and since modern medicine has a truly abysmal record of ameliorating those compulsions, it makes sense to keep rapists and child predators in jail for life as the risk of recidivism is simply so high. Of course, I don’t mean to neglect the point that their crimes are reprehensible and deserving of very long sentences.
Here are the pros as I see them:
- Mandatory life sentences would send a message that such crimes are not tolerated by society.
- Mandatory life sentences have an advantage over capital punishment in that those who are found to have been wrongly convicted can be released and compensated, even after a great many years.
- The recidivism rate would be extremely low indeed. The pool of potential victims would be narrowed to basically just other inmates and, frankly, no great loss there.
Here are the cons:
- It would be very expensive and we would quickly run short of cells. This is true, however, I think this could be at least partially ameliorated by legalising victimless crimes and releasing non-violent drug offenders from prison.
- Some of these prisoners may, if redeemed, manage to do good with their lives. This is also true. However, a great many more, would, if recidivism statistics are to be believed, go on to do great evil with their lives instead. Besides, if a prisoner is truly redeemed he would not let prison be an impediment to good works. The notorious Stanley ‘Tookie’ Williams spent 20 years crusading against gang violence from inside his prison cell. He certainly didn’t let his incarceration stop him. Also, under my system, he would still be alive and fighting the good fight today.
That’s about it, as far as I can tell.
So, yeah. What do you make of my ‘One Strike And You’re Out’ rule for first degree murderers, rapists, and violent child molesters?