[QUOTE=WhyNot]
Oh, come ON!
I don’t care what decade you were brought up in, there have always been, and will always be, “daring fashion” which looks comical to those not participating.
Flappers? What the hell is with the nylons rolled down and bunched up under the knee? Not to mention the distinct lack of boobies. I guess the pubescent boy look was one of those sexy ones, eh?
Beehives? What the hell does she have under there, anyway? Aluminum foil balls?
I promise not to bring up disco, if the rest of you just pretend that whole 80’s Madonna thing never happened, okay?
However, I will admit that this sagging thing is annoyingly persistent. But it seems that not even geeky white kids can kill this fad.
[/QUOTE]
Nope, gotta disagree - while teenage fads are generally extreme, they are usually at least an attempt to be “sexy” in some way - lots of people find the flapper look sexy; beehives, disco, Maddonna – all were found “sexy” by at least some people at the time, oldsters included (the styles were considered “shameless”, “immoral” etc.). It is only in retrospect, after a reaction against their ubiquity and absurdity set in, that they seem silly.
At the other extreme there is of course stuff like punk.
The difference here is that just about everyone can at once see that wearing pants that make you look like an ill-dressed toddler, and actually impede your ability to walk without your pants falling down, is amusing rather than sexy, slutty, intimidating, etc. 