Shirley Temple or, I really feel the passage of time.

Now that would be a movie I’d like to see. Shirley Temple IS Katharine Hepburn!

Actually, now I’m envisioning SHirley Temple in all of Hepburn’s roles and I may have to blind my mind’s eye with a hot poker.

My mother used to be a major Temple fan, even has a few pieces of Depression glass with Temple’s face on it. She made me sit through a few of them as a kid and I hated them. I have a low tolerance for treacle and pretty much the mere appearance of little Shirley puts me over the limit. I could barely even stand to watch that Brady Bunch episode where Cindy tries to become the new Shirley Temple, because, good god, one was more than enough.

I liked the older Shirley Temple in ingenue roles in movies such as Fort Apache and the Bachelor and the Bobby Soxer.

Shirley in THE LITTLEST LION IN WINTER (pouting): I’d hang you from my nipples, but you’d shock the children!

Actually, all the time. They still remain some of the best comedies in debatably the best decade of comedy in American cinema.

Wow. Just…wow.

The Three Stooges suck, too.

I think Little Miss Marker (1934), adapted from a Damon Runyan story, holds up well, with its fast-talking mix of sass and sentiment typical of early thirties movies.

I just can’t look at Shirley Temple the same way ever since I learned about the Baby Burlesques. Words cannot express how disturbing it is to learn that at three or four she played the part of a prostitute seducing a politician and adults thought this was funny. I suppose they really have been exploiting kids in film since it all began.

Say what you will about her, she was actually a fairly good dancer – the bitch could do wings (tap-dance move that looks kind of like a jumping jack – except you do taps with both toes when your feet are in the “out” position), which are realy freaking hard!

I grew up with her movies and have a certain nostalgic fondness for them, but I can watch '30s musicals with no problem.

Oh, that is interesting! I will have to tell him that when he comes home tonight. For some reason, that really stuck out in his mind; he kept commenting on it yesterday, and made sure I heard the dialogue when it came up. Thanks for solving that mystery!

For this, you need to die. Or marry me.

Yes; I’ve heard it pointed out that stage style acting doesn’t work as well in movies or on TVs; stage actors are seen and heard with the naked eyes and ears at a distance, so they have to exaggerate things to come across to the audience. Translated to a large screen, or a close up on a TV, everything looks overdone.

Watch one of the comedies of the Ritz Brothers or Wheeler and Woolsey or Olsen and Johnson, and you’ll see what a Marx Brothers movie looks like without the Marx Brothers. The Marx Brothers movies are great for only one reason - because they had the Marx Brothers in them. It would have been so much better if they had ever had a chance to be in a movie that was as good as they were.

It’s like what later happened to Richard Pryor - another comedic genius who never got a role that deserved his talent.

Have a boo at “To the Last Man” (1933). Not your typical Temple movie. To the Last Man (1933) - IMDb

What does “have a boo” mean?

You’re welcome.

Shirly as Katherine…“The Cawwa wiliies are in bloom…”

(can’t recall the movie-Long Day’s Journey into Night, maybe?)

Oh, this is just weird! Shirly in Bringing Up Baby…Shirley in Philadelphia Story…ack!

:eek:

Stage Door.

Shirley Temple in On Golden Pond: “C’mon, Mister Norman. Don’t be such a grumpy face. You’re my knight in shining armor.”