Possibly. If a limb is damaged then moving it around at all could irritate it, assuming they’re anything like our wounds.
I found a couple of cites, Do Invertebrates Feel Pain? and A Question of Pain in Invertebrates. Each page includes a list of references, and the consensus seems to be that while invertebrates in general tend to respond to heat, electricity, or chemicals, insects in particular seem to not notice when they are injured by crushing or slicing.
This is why I don’t believe sci-fi movies. The robots always have terrible aim in those movies. In real life, they can hit a mosquito from across the room.
The mosquito is the deadliest animal on earth as far as people are concerned. It is not that we must not kill, but we must not kill without reflection.
Having reflected, I say burn 'em out of the sky. (Or nuke them from orbit. It is the only way to be sure.)
Alas, even squirming about doesn’t prove that they feel pain. They simply may not have evolved a good response to these unusual stimuli.
(And I’d expect any animal with a nervous systen to squirm under an electric shock; even corpses will do that.)
Since we don’t really understand qualia it’s hard to say for sure, but I’d be skeptical since it’s hard to see how the sensation of pain would serve as useful a function for a mosquito as it does for, say, mammals.
Pain says to a mammal: try to avoid doing whatever caused this (as a big simplification). But mosquitoes’ capacity for learning is pretty low. And anyway: situations where mosquitoes may feel pain without also dying seem rare to me.
If we consider this to be true and that the 1/10 of a second it takes to laser them is inhumanely drawn out, squishing them with your hand would be the equivalent of the garbage masher scene in Star Wars. I guess killing them at all in any way that our glacially-paced human bodies can manage is right out. The mosquitoes must be spared because any death we could give them would be horrible due to their superlative time-percepting abilities.
Never thought I’d see the day someone would actually put forth the concept “Won’t somebody think of the mosquitoes?” in a serious manner.
I wonder if subjective consciousness is necessary for pain to be an effective motivator. What good would ‘pain’ do if there is no subjective consciousness to experience it and plan methods of avoiding it?
I like my hamburger. An animal DIED to provide my with my Hamburger. I’m okay with that.
Human physiology is built to be omnivorous. Has been for millions of years. I choose to not fight millions of years of evolution, mostly because it’s so damn tasty.
I don’t care to have bugs in the house, therefore I fumigate.
I don’t care to have my cats eaten by coyotes or owls, I keep them inside. I don’t care to have my parrot eaten by my cats, so I take steps to keep them separate.
Humans are odd dichotomies. I kill every mosquito I get the chance to.
In one of the home-grown cartoons in MIT’s student newspaper, The Tech, someone had a series about someone using a laser to shoot down flies. This was in the mid-1970s. Reality has finally caught up.
If that were the best way to ensure my own survival, absolutely. If a quick and painless method of killing the beast improved my odds, I’d use that. But at the end of the day, it’s the dog or me - the dog’s pain simply isn’t a part of my decision-making process.
Now, I actually think that dogs have real personalities - there’s something going on their heads. I’ve known dogs whom I genuinely liked - and I would still burn them alive to save my own life, if that were the option that gave me the best chance of survival. I’d regret it deeply, but I’d do it.
As for mosquitos? Tiny flying automatons, with no minds at all to speak of? I won’t go out of my way to inflict suffering on one (assuming they actually can.) But if inflicting an agonizing death on the bugs truly was the best way to save hundreds of thousands of human lives - it isn’t even a question. Of course I’m for it.
Of course, if this isn’t the best method - and it seems awfully spendy and finicky for the developing world - then that’s reason enough not to use it. But, again, bug welfare doesn’t enter into it at all.
I like to believe that not only are bugs intelligent, they are actually sentient and every year attend a huge meeting where they discuss how best to attack the human race.
And then on the last day, before the ceremonial bug strippers show up, they have a fascinating discussion on how best to fuck over me in particular.
You didn’t meet me at summer camp, where I was known as the Small Critters’ Best Friend for begging other campers not to kill insects (including ants, though not mosquitoes).
Empathy for insects aside, the mosquito-zapping device and its R&D costs constitute a serious misuse of resources, because the problem with mosquitoes lies in developing countries, where 25 to 30 million people (mostly children) die yearly from malaria.
Other posters have addressed this, I know. What is needed is an inexpensive technology that can effectively reduce mosquito-borne transmission, can be distributed easily to remote areas, and is not difficult to use.
To compare the West Nile virus to malaria is laughable at best. I am not saying the virus itself is mild, but its impact on the world is.
I need it battery powered, and set up on a perimeter when I go camping. Once it hits twilight, all of my Scouts are brought inside the safety zone and we hit the switch.