I’m not smart enough to know what that means. I’m not even sure if you are being sarcastic. What are the emanations from the penumbra to which you are referring?
It is a reference to a comment in Justice Douglas’ opinion in the Griswold case, describing the derivation of a generalized right to privacy from the more specific recitations of the Constitution. The wording is often invoked by conservatives to deride this sort of legal reasoning. The point I was making is that Bork was (at best) using precisely this sort of handwave to derive a narrowed definition of “freedom of speech” that is nowhere to be found in the Constitutional text.