That almost had soda coming outta my nose. Thats the best laugh I had all day. Thanks !
‘Should “Hot Naked Babe” threads be in Cafe Society or MPSIMS?’
Yes. Oh, yes please. 
Glad I could clear that up.
Okay, I don’t rent from my mother, but my new place does have two dark-paneled walls ( one wall in the kitchen and one wall in the living room, non-matching cheaply paneled walls at that - why? - beats the fuck out of me ). Yes they’re mildly hideous, but do you have to rub my nose in it :p?
As to the dank, I deliberately got the lower flat for it’s cave-like, dank ambience. Dank is good. Sunlight is bad. So says this graveyard worker for the last decade+ ( soon to end sob ).
- Tamerlane
Ryle Dup I just about fell off my chair with that link, very funny! Oh, er, I mean terrible, just terrible the way you poked fun at this serious thread… (no, it was funny) 
-
Show me one thread where gay Dopers come into Cafe Society talking about the dick on the hot Playgirl centerfold.
-
I’m not protesting the threads, I’m suggesting they belong in a different forum. You wanna discuss how instruction manuals are designed, or interpreted, whatever–ditto Playboy–discuss it in Cafe Society. You wanna discuss the content of the instructions–“How do I get my Hello Kitty vibrator to work underwater?”–do it in GQ. You want to discuss the content, likewise, of Playboy–“Tia Carrera is one hot naked babe!”–do it in MPSIMS.
I like tits.
Spack off, lissener.
A simple search brought up this, and this.
Granted, neither were in Cafe Society, and I don’t feel gay dopers have any exclusivity in discussing dicks on Playgirl centerfold, but there was ample discussion about dicks.
You claim that you are not protesting the threads, yet your OP clearly is a rant against just that kind of thread. You are playing junior moderator, but you have much more hopping to do, grasshopper.
Color me still confused.
I’ve had technical discussions about art - written papers about Maplethorpes use of lighting, the advent of color in movies. But the most interesting discussions I’ve had, papers I’ve written, and papers I’ve read are not about “the photography” or “the technique” but about the content. Which, in Playboy - happens to be tits.
Now, granted, they aren’t having socio-political discussions about the implications of bigger or smaller breasts in Playboy (someone just did do a study on that), but they are certainly having an appreciation discussion about the content. I don’t see much difference between waxing eloquently on Tia Carrare’s breasts in Playboy or doing the same about the beauty of Yosemite in Ansel Adams’ photographs. Certainly, a discussion of the beauty of Yosemite through the eyes of Ansel Adams belongs in Cafe Society.
Now, a general discussion on Tia’s breast would belong in MPSIMS - but in this particular case, they are taking about breasts via a specific medium that has its own praxis. Thus, Cafe Society is a perfectly appropriate forum.
Well, most people don’t want to hump the bejeezus out of Yosemite. Unless perhaps they’re talking about yosemitebabe. Or am I just nitpicking?
Playboy is Art.
Hustler is not.
Panda is Panda.
No Clue Boy has NO clue!
and pandas can sod off!
Said the babe in the smock.