Should President Bush be TIME's 2004 Man of the Year?

Way too late. Sorry. If you can’t see it, there’s no way you can be shown.

Rummy’s track record has clearly been a disaster since last spring. Bush rehired him.

How many ‘bad apples’ do there have to be, before one has to acknowledge a systemic problem? We’re well over a hundred already. Plus we’ve got the torture memos from the White House, and apparently a secret Executive Order now.

Sure, it’s been going on for years. But the scientific record became a lot more definitive in the late 1990s, and when Bush was running in 2000, he burnished his illusion of moderation by claiming he’d act to limit CO2 emissions. Then he changed his mind shortly after inauguration, dissed Kyoto and said his Administration would produce an alternative…we’re still waiting.

No global accord on attempts to ameliorate man’s impact on global warming is meaningful without US participation, seeing as how we’re the world’s largest economy. GWB has now been in charge of the stall-ball in dealing with global warming for four years, and he’ll stall for another four years. If a hypothetical Dem President and Congress in 2009 act quickly and decisively on CO2 emissions, they’ll still be trying to cause those emission levels to level out by 2012 or 2015, and then start the slow march back toward year-2000 emissions levels. Essentially, every year you act means you have a year’s slippage on emissions levels, plus another year needed to undo that year’s slippage.

In the case of global warming, inaction sufficed. The huge budget deficits are now overwhelmingly due to Bush tax cuts. Those deficits, and the trade deficits they help finance, are why our dollar will plummet in value over the next year or so, and why our dollar has a very good chance of ceasing to be the world’s reserve currency soon - something that would have been unthinkable just four years ago. Not to mention, if the dollar’s plummet happens in a month or two, rather than over a couple years, the result will likely be worldwide recession. That’ll be Bush’s fault if it happens, in the sense that it will take a great deal of combined luck and kindness of strangers to forestall it.

And then there is Iraq as well.

To portray Bush as a passive actor, with no real responsibility for events, in the midst of his own Administration, is intellectually dishonest. There is no evidence that he has been defrauded and misled. He has rehired, praised, and even given medals to the subordinates (Bremer, Tenet) who might have been responsible for aspects of the perfect storm that is the Bush Administration. And in having done so, he’s said he’s George Bush, and he approves these people’s actions. So let’s get real, OK? When Iraq, the dollar, and the economy all tank, you can thank George. When Canada’s winters are temperate, and the southern tier of US states becomes too hot for habitation, think on GWB’s period of inaction during the first decade when the reality of global warming became indisputable.

It used to be said that to err is human, but to really screw up requires a computer. That has been proven false. GWB for Man of the Year, Man of the Decade, and early favorite for Man of the Century.

George W. Bush is nothing but a clueless sock puppet. To “reward” him not once, but twice, as MOTY is ridiculous. I read the Time magazine story on him and it made him out as this shrewd master politician with a far-reaching vision for the world in the 21st century. I immediately cancelled my subscription. I think I’ll donate the $17.25 refund I’m getting (in 10-12 weeks, mind you) to the ACLU.

I’m with Frost on this… its rewarding Bush… and I’m happy I’m not longer subscribing to TIME… but Newsweek instead.

Its certainly not ‘Way too late’. I realize that Iraq is a mess right now and its largely due to Bush’s mismanagement. However if the elections go smoothly I can see a gradual move towards stability. If something goes wrong with the election then all will be lost.

This is a debate for another thread but can you point to any action by Bush in the last year that caused all of this?

Which is exactly what almost every politician has said since global warming became an issue.

Bush deserves MOTY for doing nothing about global warming? If thats what earns MOTY then I predict that the U.S. president will be MOTY for atleast the next 10-15 years.

Even if this is all true Bush’s Tax cuts didn’t happen in the last year did they?

The biggest economic decision Bush made was his tax cuts which was not made in the last year. The Kyoto Protocol was written in 98 the U.S. hasn’t been signing it for 6 years now. Nothing remarkable changed in regards to the U.S.global warming policy in the last year.

My point is that Bush certainly has made a huge impact on the course of history but no significant decisions were made in the last year.

Imagine for a second if WMDs were found in Iraq and Iraq had become a stable democracy. Bush would have won the election in a landslide, Removing Saddam would have been justified, the U.S. would not be as hated as it is now, the economy would be doing better. None of this happened due to the lack of WMDs and the Iraqi insurgent. Instead Bush barely won a hotly contested election, the U.S. has lost all credibility, we are becoming increasingly hated in the world. In the last year the Iraqi insurgent and lack of WMDs has done more to shape the course of the world than any of Bush’s decisions. Thats why they get my vote.