of all the magazines with Sandra Bullock’s face at the grocery check out lane, the one that caught my eye had the title "Married to a Monster!"
Poor Sandra, in the same catagory with Eva Braun, Nadezhda Alliluyeva and Mrs. Pol Pot.
I have to admit that I don’t read the celebrity stuff in the media but about 2 months ago I offered up Sandra Bullock as someone who has kept her private life private. I didn’t know whether she was married, or in a relationship at all. Apparently I was wrong.
Per the public statements of his most recent fling, I think the (apparent) fact that he was hung like a bull elephant might have had something to do with her seemingly odd choice in SOs. I don’t know SB’s preferences in men, but for a variety of reasons some women really, really like men with large endowments and find it a big turn on. If he was an an intelligent conversationalist with rough edges, so much the better.
Maybe he’s got a really big schlong.
I always thought SB looked like a mannequin. That role she just won an Oscar for…didn’t she play a rich white woman? There’s a stretch.
There is a good take on the whole thing here.
Quoted for truth - Sandra Bullock would be far from the first woman who thought she could “fix” her bad boy with the power of her love.
My thought was, “She’s not married to a monster; she’s married to an asshole.”
That’s interesting; so Jesse was not playing a character, but Sandra mis-took him for playing one?
That would explain the results.