Should Sestak Squeal?

Just wait until the nonstop images of oily birds and tarred wetlands start rolling in.

And the chants of “Drill, baby, drill!” at the teabag rallies keep coming too? Your assessment is driven by wishful thinking.

You want Obama to take the blame for not cleaning the LA marshlands and fishing grounds, but don’t want “big government” to do anything either. May I suggest you make up your damn mind?

That’s when BP, oil companies in general and “drill baby drill” tards start taking a hit. There is no reasonable way to blame it on Obama.

When did “reasonable” come into it?

You should read the previous posts before typing this tripe.

Hahaha…you think reason matters? The hit will come from the left.

The left isn’t going anywhere when it comes to the elections, though.

You see any sign of that? Where?

Considering there is a huge oil field in Alaska right next to a pipeline that was purposely built to deliver it I’d say drilling on land makes more sense.

Not that shit again.

No, alternative energy makes more sense.

Sestak’s number’s are plummeting.

Blagojevich’s trial is going to drag the stink of Chicago politics into the spotlight. Selling a Senate seat in the shadow of Sestak and Romanoff’s White House offers will look bad. It won’t matter if all he does is praise the shine on Obama’s shoes. The guys a loose cannon who is bound to say something stupid if it helps his case. He owes nothing to the party at this point.

You’re quoting Rasmussen? Seriously? :smiley: The Fox of the polling world?

And if you think Obama is still best going to be characterized as a Chicago pol, after two years as President, you’re kidding yourself. That shit didn’t even work before the election.

It doesn’t take much to paint his administration is a bunch of Chicago cronies and Wall Street rejects who don’t pay their taxes. He lost his halo pretty quick.

It doesn’t take much to try that, sure. But will it convince anybody but you and your fellow pre-convinced? How?

Why the hell would Sestak’s numbers fall if he said NO? What, ostensibly, is Sestak guilty of?

That doesn’t make any sense. Even if we assume that Obama and his team were a cabal of criminal plotters, what did Sestak do that was wrong?

With all due respect, it appears you’re just grabbing at random bits of information that are tangentially related to the subject and posting htme here as though they form some coherent picture.

Sestak’s numbers are strongly rising, and that includes the heavily-overweighted Rasmussen numbers in the averaging.

But, whatever gives you comfort.

You are correct…they may not even go to the polls.

Did you notice the word “will” in the comment? It’s already happening with Carville, and Spike Lee is upset at Obama’s lack of passion. Even Maureen Dowd is starting to complain.

If it were going to happen, it would have started already. Please.

Spike Lee? :smiley: