AS one who is struggling with my 2003 federal income tax return, I say YES! The Federal tax code is now so complicated that it takes up too many resources to evade…here are my reasons for a national sales tax:
-it is cheap to administer
-it forces segments of society that pay NOTHING now to contribute
-it need not be onorous…a rate of 1.5-2.0% would be optimal
-the government would realize a more constant revenue stream
Finally, it would allow the social engineers in Washington MORE money to fund their idiotic schemes, without taxing wealth creation (which is the big problem with the income tax).
WE could also move to a flat rate tax on income, which would make the IRS unnecessary. Expand the sales tax base by legalizing drugs, and we’ve solved the deficit problem!
Anybody object to this? 
Without going into the substance of your question I will say that there is no way to get rid of income tax. It ain’t gonna happen. And that Value Added Tax is vastly superior to sales tax.
Why do you think that a national sales tax would be cheaper to administer? You are still going to need a big organization to handle collections, reporting, evasion, laws, etc. Are you proposing eliminating corporate taxes and non-profit and trust filings too? If not you are still going to need the IRS.
What segments of society pay nothing now? Only the very poor. I don’t think it is a good idea to tax the very poor more then a token amount anyway. What good would come to society by forcing them to contribute.
Where did you get the 1.5-2.0%? The proposals I have seen for a national sales tax have a rate of closer to 20%.
he government is already realizing a fairly constant revenue stream. It is called payroll withholding and estimated payments.
The people who pay nothing today are the very poor, and those who live in the underground economy (cash businesses, drug dealers,prostitutes, etc.) However, there is a HUGE segment of society that gets away with paying very little-these are the real-estate millionaires (who avoid income taxes by taking advantage of depreciation-on appreciating assets!), there is also the “old-money” crowd (like the Kennedy family), who recive money from tax-free investments (municipal bonds, etc.), and shelter incomein off-shore partnerships. THES are the people that would at least pay SOMETHING with a national sales tax.In fact the old money people are those who OPPOSE income tax reform the most-they wouldlose if they were made to pay under a national sales tax. Think about it-Jow Kennedy purchase a $2 million dollar mansion-he pays 2% (or $40,000). This is far superior to him paying nothing. 
It won’t work. Avoiding a sales tax on individuals is just too easy. A corporation buys the stuff for you.
according to this the amount of outlays in the federal buget is about 20.2% of GDP for 2004. I don’t think 1.5%-2% is going to work. A 20% increse on the prices of everything will have a determental effect on the economy.
You might also want to check out This
I don’t think that real-estate millionaires can be called a HUGE segment of the society that pays little in taxes. The depreciation deductions they get to take aren’t as wonderful as you seem to think they are. Plus, they still have to pay capital gains tax when they sell those appreciating assets.
When Jow (?) Kennedy purchases a $2 million dollar mansion he pays property taxes on it. Now, I know that doesn’t go to the federal government but it isn’t like he isn’t paying any taxes.
As far as the tax free investments, under your plan all investments would be tax free. What is to stop the millionaires to keep living in their old $1.5 million mansion and still avoid paying taxes? Besides, do you really think that a home purchase will wind up being taxed under national sales tax laws? I doubt it. Real estate sales aren’t taxed under any state sales tax laws that I know of.
Where did you come up with the 2% anyway? There is no way that is going to be enough.
Thread about eliminating or drastically reducing corporate taxes and instituting a broad-based consumption tax, ie VAT. There’s a good link kabbes gives to a PDF file outlining empirical data that contrasts with some existing theory about consumption taxes.
Uh… why would the corporation necessarily be exempt from the tax?
When I read the thread subject, I thought, “Sales tax?! That benefits the wealthy and punishes the poor. It’s the same kind of tripe the flat tax morons are into.”
And lo, I was right.
Uh, you realize corporations are now, in fact, exempt from sales taxes? And you know there is a reason? If every sale along the manufacturing process is taxed then you end up with a terrible system. Suppose you buy a car. How much of what you paid is taxes? No way to know as all along the chain taxes were paid. Not only that, it favors huge corporations which can integrate operations. If the car manufacturer buys the radio from a supplier he pays tax. The radio manufacturer pays tax when he buys the parts. The manufacturer of the parts pays tax when he buys materials, etc. If the car manufacturer does all that himself he avoids paying tons of tax so the tax is not neutral but favors integration into huge corporations as a way of not paying taxes. There are many reasons why a sales tax is a terrible idea. VAT was invented for a reason and even VAT has only replaced sales taxes, NOT income taxes.
Corporations are not exempt from all sales tax. They do not pay sales tax on items from resale but they do pay sales tax on items they use.
In general, a radio manufactor wouldn’t pay sales tax on speakers it puts into the radio but it does pay sales tax on the machinery it uses to build the radio. Walmart doesn’t pay sales tax on the radios they buy to sell to consumers but they do pay sales tax on the radio they buy to put in the employee’s break room.
Uh, no! 
I didn’t realize that. But you raise a good justification for it… I find it hard to believe that all corporations are completely exempt from sales taxes in Canada. Does anyone know whether or not this is true?
Admittedly, I know >< that much about corporate tax.
I am going to ask for some evidence of that. What state? Sales tax is a state and local tax. I find this extremely hard to believe. Where do you get your information? So, you are saying that a corporation pays sales tax on the plant and machinery they buy? Also on the consumables they use which are not incorporated into the final product? But not on the materials incorporated into the product they sell? So if they buy paint to paint the building they pay sales tax? But if they buy paint to paint the product they sell then they dont pay sales tax? really? So a corporation which sells services pays sales tax on everything as they sell no material products? really? Where is this again? I find it extremely hard to believe any state would have such a backwards and irrational and complicated system but I suppose it is possible. What states are we talking about?
sailor, companies don’t have an immediate free pass from sales taxes. You have to have reasons to be exempt from paying taxes. In most cases, this is because you intend to resell the good, but additional reasons (non-profits, for example) vary from state to state. If your company moves from one location to another, do you pay sales tax on the cost of the moving service? South Dakota says so. If you google terms like ‘exempt’ and ‘state sales tax’ you’ll find more information than you could possibly ever know. The laws are simply not consistent since they are a state and local matter.
What a lot of questions! My answers are in bold.
I just gave you the simple rules. The rules are pretty complicated with machinery because all kinds of industries get special treatment or deals on their machinery. In the Carolina there is also a sales tax on equipment leases.
And, if a company buys something for inventory and then decides to use it rather then sell it they have to submit the sales tax themselves. It is called “use” tax when that happens. Use tax also comes into effect when a corporation buys equipment from out of state.
What proof do you have that corporations don’t have to pay sales tax? That is the odd claim that needs to be backed up. Can you show me something in any state tax code that says corporations are exempt from all sales tax? I don’t know the specific rules for any state but I doubt that any state with a sales tax completely exempts all corporations.
Drat - that should say "I don’t know the specific rules for all states.
If that is so it is the most ridiculous tax system I have ever seen in my life and it is a huge burden on business in more ways than one.
Suppose I am making cars. The fact that I would pay sales tax on the tools and consumables used to make the car but not on the materials incorporated in the final product would make no sense as they both are expenses directly incurred in the manufacture of the product. Tha paint on the car pays no tax because it goes out the door with the car but the masking tape pays tax because it is left behind. It must be an accounting nightmare. Furthermore, it just makes no sense.
It makes it impossible to account for the amount of taxes paid in the manufacture of any particular product. When a manufacturer buys widgets he has no way of knowing how much of the price is taxes already paid along the way. this information is essential when you export to other countries because governments are allowed to reimburse for taxes paid but anything else is considered a subsidy. How do American exporters manage this? How can they calculate the amount of taxes which went into a product?
Furthermore, what is the accumulated sales tax paid by the final consumer? Suppose you buy a car. The accumulated sales taxes paid along the way have to be staggering. i find it hard to believe.
It favors integration into big manufacturing corportaions and hurts outsourcing to smaller, more specialized, manufacturers. For this reason alone I just find it extremely hard to believe.
I am not familiar with this aspect of sales taxes in the USA but for the reasons I have posted I just find it extremely hard to believe and I would like to see some confirmation. In Maryland it is not the case.
Can anyone direct me to specific information of specific states where it is so? i am very interested because it would be as backwards and archaic and anti-business as one can possibly imagine.
Oops, forgot the link: Maryland taxes.
The more I think about it the more I think the sales tax concept is a nightmare to administer and is plagued with problems, not the least of which is that you have no way of knowing how much you are taxing products. VAT is vastly superior and I do not understand why it has not been adopted by the several states instead of sales tax.
In Massachusetts, businesses have to pay sales tax on electricity or other power sources (gas, oil, etc) under certain conditions. PDF here.
As far as capital goes,
They then go on to caution that the laws are complicated and this is only meant to be a guide. So for example, it is likely the case that a manufacturer of circuit boards wouldn’t pay sales tax on the raw materials, but would on something like an oscilloscope which wouldn’t fall under the above exemptions. It is unclear to me what, exactly, “manufacturing” is supposed to entail, but if it relates directly to tangible goods then it is quite possible that a multi-building company in Massachusetts like Millennium might have an administrative building where no or little research and manufacturing is done, in which case they’d pay on the energy thing mentioned above.
I agree VAT is vastly superior, from what I have read of it.
http://www.dor.state.nc.us/practitioner/sales/bulletins/toc.html Have fun! In NC it really depends on the industry and the type of equipment you are purchasing.
Even your example salior isn’t the same thing as saying corporations pay no sales tax.