I’m not watching the Olympics (I think it should have been called off), but this headline grabbed my attention:
This seems nuts to me. Why not an 8-year old? Or a 5-year old? I would like to see the Olympics limited to adult athletes, minimum age 18.
I’ve been googling in an attempt to find an Olympic mission statement. This seems pretty close:
The goal of the Olympic Movement is to contribute to building a peaceful and better world by educating youth through sport practiced without discrimination of any kind and in the Olympic spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play.
I know it says “youth,” but I think there should be a minimum age. The little girls who get into gymnastics, for example, starve themselves, commit to practice-practice-practice to the point of (IMHO) abuse. Not to mention the abuse they sometimes endure from trainers and coaches to whom they become closer than their parents. And then at 15 or 18 or God forbid 20, they’re over the hill.
Yeah, I know other activities involve and overwork children at distressingly young ages, including careers in music and dance. Little kids also work in factories, and on farms, and weave rugs, too. That is not relevant to my point. I’m talking about the Olympics.
I know there children who are quite accomplished in athletics (6-year old female skateboarder), and okay, let’s develop a way for them to be recognized. But not the Olympics.
If you’re going to ask me, should there be an upper age limit, I’ll say I don’t know. What do you think?