Should we make anti-vaccine parents pay more?

The analogy that I always like to use is to compare the infectious disease to a nuclear cascade. If, on average, each infected individual infects more than one person before they recover, then one case becomes two, which becomes four, which allows the epidemic to grow out of control, the same way a supercritical mass of uranium allows a single atomic fission to cascade out of control until the whole thing melts or explodes.

The purpose of vaccination isn’t to reduce the transmission rate to zero, it is merely to reduce the transmission rate below 1, the same way that impurities in a mass of uranium can reduce a supercritical mass to a subcritical mass. Do that, and instead of an out of control cascade, the chain reaction will quickly die out on its own. But since viruses cannot be spontaneously generated like free neutrons can in a radioactive material, once the chain reaction dies out, it stays dead.

I’m not sure about international and federal law, but we don’t allow child abuse, we don’t allow parents to starve their children. Hell, we don’t even allow them to give them hot sauce as a punishment method.

So there is no way in hell we should allow parents to “choose” not to vaccinate their children.

It wouldn’t be particularly difficult to enforce. Since almost all children enroll in public or private school, we can just require proof of vaccination at that point. Anyone who wants to home school will have to provide proof to local government that their children have been vaccinated.

Any parent that gets caught not vaccinating a child is prosecuted, and the child taken away.

We won’t be able to catch all of them, but we don’t have to. Just most. That’ll prevent the spread of disease.