I’m an engineer. Through my job, I volunteer one day a month at a local middle school: I give talks showing applications of the math topics the teachers are covering. (Part of my motivation is that when I was in junior high, I didn’t understand how math could be anything other than a dull, useless drudgery, and I wish I could go back in a time machine and show my 14-year old self that it’s useful and actually fun).
I really enjoy it when the kids are interested, which is most of the time. But about one quarter of them really don’t seem like they’re ever going to get anything out of academic topics.
It’s hard not to wonder if everyone would be better off if these kids were steered into more vocational topics by the time they’re, say, 15 or 16, similarly to the European system.
I know we have a vocational education system, but unlike in Britain, where you have to do well enough on standardized tests to get admitted to college, pretty much anyone who wants to can go to college in the US.
If we set our sights on everyone getting a college education, it would seem that lowered standards are inevitible: my brother is a math professor, and he laments that he has to cover things that should have been taught in hgh school. He believes that a big part of the ‘universal education’ mantra is colleges wanting to make more money – fifty years ago, students who weren’t academically prepared didn’t get into college; today, they get in, and after paying tuition for a year or two, weed themselves out. (I would imagine that a similar loss or ‘turf’ by the secondary educational system would impede any changes that resulted in preparing fewer students for college).
One definite upside to easy access to college: people who dick around in high school can wise up and go to college later, when they’re more prepared. I know, because I am just such a person: I didn’t graduate until I was 26, and would probably never have gone to college in a system like the Brits’.
I get the impression that a lot of parents place an intangible value on having their kids go to college and graduate, even if it’s not the best fit for the kid. If true, I wish such parents would reconsider: I’m childless, but if I had the choice between a child who squeaked through college and didn’t do much with it, and a child who didn’t go to college but made a decent living as a locksmith or mechanic, I’d take the latter.
It still appears that workers with college degrees earn more than those without. But this doesn’t rule out the possibility that some people with degrees would have done better pursuing other career paths.
This week, I shared my thoughts with one of the teachers whose class I visit, and was surprised to learn that she agreed with me. I welcome all opinions, but would especially value those of teachers.
I apologize if something close to this topic has been covered - my searches turned up nothing that sounded like it.