Showing my ignorance: What's the difference between pasta and "noodles"

Dang. Sometimes I hate having my ignorance reduced! I loved that story. :frowning:

But doing a bit more research it seems that while the Marco Polo story may be a popular fiction, the Silk Road origin of boiled pasta still seems to be true … just occurring much earlier.

That article also credits the Chinese with making pasta first.

It appears as a baked product in Italy around 400 B.C.E. Unclear if it was an independent invention or the result of travel and exposure.

I used to love soft-wheat “spaghetti” (Aus was mostly a soft-wheat producer). Sadly, the whole country has shifted over to “authentic” hard-wheat pasta now, and you can’t get soft-wheat spaghetti for love nor money.

One difference? It takes 3 times as long to cook. Which means that the kids buy rice noodles for fast food now.

I recall once reading a mention of a Roman soldier, or an army officer I think, popping up at one Chinese court, so it’s possible. (I believe it was a brief mention in A Penguin History of the World, by JM Roberts, not sure.) So they at least knew of each other. But maybe it went the other way, with Italy introducing it to China. China habitually claims credit for every invention under the sun, even the game of golf, so it would be just like them to claim credit for noodles even if they didn’t.

I had no idea that anyone made a distinction between the words.

There are different shapes, different ingredients, and the method to make them vary quite a bit but they are all noodles to me.