[QUOTE=Baldwin]
Easy, there. First, Lizzie Borden was never convicted of a crime; we’ll probably never know what happened. Unless you have evidence that nobody else has presented in the past 115 years, you’re making an accusation without proof.
[/quote]
Well, OJ was acquitted, too. Doesn’t mean the preponderance of evidence indicates he was innocent.
All of this is irrelevant to the topic, though. My apologies for opening this particular can of pinochle-playing worms. We can stick a (male or female) fork in it.
RR
When I was a child, I read (probably in Jack and Jill magazine) a poem whose purpose was to teach children how to properly set a table. It did this by suggesting you think of the silverware as a family - the fork was Mommy, the knife was Daddy, and the spoon was their little boy. (I assume Daddy was the knife because the knife is the tallest.) All I remember of the poem is the last line: “And the Daddy holds the little boy’s hand.”
[/QUOTE]
I may be the only person in the universe who does this (or maybe it’s an yet-to-be-discovered but harmless chronic condition?), but I have from childhood gendered everything. In an email entitled, “Your services are needed,” my husband alerted me to this controversy. I can say with certainty that the knife is male (and in my childhood heterosexist view, the father), the fork female (wife), and the spoon male (son) and salad fork female (daughter). Pepper is male and salt female.
This is the first I’ve come across the rhyme, and the best I can guess is that cultural notions of gender (size and proportion foremost in this case) are so endemic that a tall piece of silverware with mainly straight lines would appear male to me (and others, apparently), and a piece with a curvy ‘shelf’ that would remind one of breasts or hips would appear female. Beyond that I have no explanation beyond my own possible psychosis.
Do let me know if any controversies arise about the genders of various models, makes and colors of cars, towels, chairs, backpacks, spices, or refrigerators, as I will undoubtedly have an answer.
Everything is a bit unusual, but numbers, letters, days of the week, months of the year, colors, etc., are quite common, so don’t worry about it. Just be aware that not everyone does it, and that those who do often disagree. Similar phenomena involve perceiving abstract things as colored, or fitting into odd-shaped lines (see Number Form in Wikipedia).
[QUOTE=Johanna]
In (…) Lithuanian too. saulė (f.) / mėnuo (m.)
[/QUOTE]
I’m not familiar with the Baltic languages at all, but those sound heavily influenced by Latin. Are they borrowings or is it one of those mysterious non-causal similarities?
I don’t really know Baltic either, but the similarity comes because Lithuanian, Latin, and English are all Indo-European languages. Lith. menuo is presumably related to English moon and month and to Latin mensis (“month”), all of which come from the proto-Indo-European root *me- (to measure). The usual Latin word for the moon, luna, is from a different root, related to English light and Latin lux. English sun, Latin sol and Lithuanian saule are all from the PIE root *saw-el- (“sun”).
The asterisks indicate the forms are reconstructed and not attested, because PIE was not a written language.
[QUOTE=bibliophage]
I don’t really know Baltic either, but the similarity comes because Lithuanian, Latin, and English are all Indo-European languages. Lith. menuo is presumably related to English moon and month and to Latin mensis (“month”), all of which come from the proto-Indo-European root *me- (to measure). The usual Latin word for the moon, luna, is from a different root, related to English light and Latin lux. English sun, Latin sol and Lithuanian saule are all from the PIE root *saw-el- (“sun”).
The asterisks indicate the forms are reconstructed and not attested, because PIE was not a written language.
[/QUOTE]
Ah…I forgot about the PIE connection. I think I was lumping Lithuanian in with Finnish and Estonian in the Uralic family.
[QUOTE=Chronos]
It’s worth noting that “gender”, as used in grammar, just means “category”. It so happens that in many Indo-European languages, the genders correlate with sexes, but a language can also have genders of “active” and “passive” (in which case a car or a river would be “active”, but a rock or a lake would be “passive”), or “tall” and “short”, or any other sort of classification of nouns.
[/QUOTE]
That helps a lot. Does anybody here know about Tsez? I heard it has four genders, with associations like “flat things” or “pointy things,” not necessarily anything to do with sex.
But the sex part is fun. What gender would a spork be?