You come into the thread and answer posts after mine yet you ignore me?
Is that how you do business?
Those were actual questions you wanted responses to? I did compare the courses. They were listed in the Globe link. Check it out before your basket weaving/chemistry assertions. I have no idea what your point is or what you want me to respond to, so I’m just guessing.
BTW, if you ever post in a thread I haven’t gotten to, please let me know. I’ll be sure to respond to every fucking post you ever make again. :rolleyes:
All righty then. I hereby Pit Mr. Bush’s policy of attempting to exit press conferences through locked doors.
Duly noted.
Even though I hate Bush, and hope he dies, I can’t fault him for picking a locked door in an unfamiliar environment.
You should send your sentiments to the Secret Service.
Did you see Letterman last night, with Bush dropping by the show?
There’s a rule of thumb that I’ve found works pretty well in that situation: Go out the door that you came in.
It’s kept me from inadvertently walking into a closet on several occasions.
Posted by Updike:
Why? The Secret Service is supposed to protect the President from actual danger, not from citizens exercising their right to say they hope he falls off the wagon and chokes on his own vomit.
It occurs to me that I should have said “choosing a locked door”.
Well, the Secret Service is probably interested in citizens who say they hope Bush dies. Those people could pose what you call an “actual danger”.
More fun at the expense of George Bush. If he gets stuck you can just click on him and drag him.
They do verbal investigate threats, I believe.
I mean they do investigate verbal threats… :smack:
Posted by Priceguy:
I can see how one might think that, if one is a bit dull, or perhaps a little hysterical. So, thanks. Perhaps this subject should be pursued sometime in a different thread (and probably already has been).