I’d consider it for a lot more money, for $15k it’s a big Hell No.
$200k i’d think about it, $500k it’s “Where do I sign”
Yeah, not in the least bit interested.
I’m sure there’s an amount that I’m willing to be bought for, but not for only 15k.
Hell no. Despite the assurances of their magical lawyers, the potential to record some of my daily activities could violate attorney client privilege, as well as various privacy rules associated with my work as a Guardian ad Litem.
Even if that were not the case, $15,000 is not nearly enough money.
Not JUST for my privacy,…
I can not even imagine ANY good comming from this.
Besides, no cheesecake!
For fifteen thousand dollars? Hell no.
Offer me fifteen million dollars and I’d at least have to think it over for a few minutes before saying no.
It doubles my household income for those 6 months, so… ok!
I’ll wear it for a month for $15,000
It’ll take at least $50,000 for me to wear it for six months.
Make it 1.5 million, and I’ll take option 2 or 3. I’m serious - nothing much below that value is worth it
For 83 dollars a day? I think not. I don’t know what sum would let me do it, actually. I am a very private person.
You don’t seem to be getting many takers, so let’s negotiate: I’ll wear your glasses for 6 months for 125k, IF you add a “privacy button” to the frames. I’ll even keep a log: “privacy button: pooping. Privacy button: sexing. Privacy button: wanking.”
For my privacy to be invaded I’d need a lot more money, 3 mil after taxes, then I’ll have to pay the people I regularly intereact with to have their privacy violated so there are at least the two people I live with that would need 3 mil a piece as well and then proably another three for the rest of the people I inteact with to be ok with it. So 12 million will get me on board.
I picked hell no because as written it’s a terrible deal that would cause me to lose my fiance and my job.
You don’t know how the study facilitators know when you’re catnapping, but you may take them off for catnaps, dognaps, buffalonaps, and any other type of somnal activity.
You cannot mute the device. The recording captures audio as well as video.
[QUOTE=Leaper]
Suppose you’re writing the Great American Novel. When it’s published, it’ll retroactively be identifying information — very conclusively, in fact.
[/QUOTE]
Do you plan on writing the Great American Novel within the next 6 months?
[QUOTE=ZipperJJ]
Sure. I could use the money, and I’m not dating anyone right now. I’d probably use it as an excuse to get my ass back to the gym for 6 months straight, knowing that people are out there judging me! I’d probably hang out with my nieces more too so they can become famous child actors.
[/QUOTE]
I really like your reasonings. 
[QUOTE=48Willys]
Not JUST for my privacy,…
I can not even imagine ANY good comming from this.
Besides, no cheesecake!
[/QUOTE]
Okay, fine. We’ll throw in a lifetime supply of cheesecake upon successful completion of the study.
[QUOTE=iftheresaway]
You don’t seem to be getting many takers, so let’s negotiate: I’ll wear your glasses for 6 months for 125k, IF you add a “privacy button” to the frames. I’ll even keep a log: “privacy button: pooping. Privacy button: sexing. Privacy button: wanking.”
[/QUOTE]
Are you kidding?! I’ve already got 8 other people (including myself) who would participate. Besides, a privacy button defeats the whole purpose of the experiment.
[QUOTE=Oredigger77]
For my privacy to be invaded I’d need a lot more money, 3 mil after taxes, then I’ll have to pay the people I regularly intereact with to have their privacy violated so there are at least the two people I live with that would need 3 mil a piece as well and then proably another three for the rest of the people I inteact with to be ok with it. So 12 million will get me on board.
I picked hell no because as written it’s a terrible deal that would cause me to lose my fiance and my job.
[/QUOTE]
So you’re saying you’re willing to give up your fiancée for $12 million? 
I guess I could probably stay away from masturbating like a mothercluck to online panda porn for six months if you paid me enough. I’ll do mostly anything for money.
I will only do it on one condition, though: Skip the private viewing of the video afterwards. You can do whatever else you want with the video, but I don’t want to see it, and certainly not with a friend. I can’t stand the thought of watching myself living my boring-ass life and being my stupid-ass self.
So, you pretty much admitted the “documentary” is about pooping, sexing, and wanking.
You assume much. I never explicitly stated what the documentary is about.
Workplaces will be a problem. Maybe if it was something like you had to have it on for X hours a day. That would let you avoid pooping, sexting, doctor/lawyer/hitmen appointments, and more secure work facilities while still getting plenty of boring real life.
There is sufficient information to identify someone by the restrictions you have given. I voted incorrectly, assuming that anonymity was much better. No identification, no problems. I don’t get people who want privacy just because. The only reason to want privacy is if you suspect someone will do something nefarious with the information they have on you.
Unfortunately, while the risk is small, nefarious use is in fact a risk, as privacy is not assured. I’d probably go with needing more money to offset that risk. Saying I wouldn’t do it at all would be stupid. This isn’t some moral objection–there is a point where the benefits would outweigh the risks. Enough money and I could essentially change my identity, if nothing else.
I’m not entirely sure why sexual preferences are the thing you leap to as being the most embarrassing, though. I mean, I may have a few kinks I’d want to keep private (simply because it could make life difficult if people knew about them, not because I’m actually ashamed of them), but sex in and of itself is nothing.
Absolutly, she’s one in a million but if I’ve got 12 million I could get 12 of her.
I was asking a probing question on just how far the definition of “identifying information” went. It seems to me that there are plenty of ways to identify people without knowing what blurred words used to be. Thus, that aspect of the subject’s privacy is not assured at all.
How silly. Why do people never understand that different people have different wants and needs? I am different from you. I want different things. I most definitely want privacy just because, and I am not suspecting anyone to do anything nefarious. I don’t even have anything to hide. Doesn’t mean I don’t want to keep it to myself!