Yes, I think I have made it clear that I didn’t care to ensure any particular degree of quality. I would hate to be someone who had to make small talk with you. You must be a tough audience, critiquing every “Good morning” or “see ya later, alligator.”
Oh, I’m fine with small talk. As long as I don’t have to wait two months to get a response from you.
You’re really hung up on that. It’s really new to you, eh, that someone can leave an offhand comment in a Pit thread after TWO WHOLE MONTHS!! Egads!
From someone who has been here over a decade, yes.
From some Newbie who found this place via Google? Not so much.
Now I find this a dubious comment. As in I suspect its reliability. You protest too much.
Nah, it’s a slow night at work and I have nothing else to do but engage you in silly debate.
So, when do you two lovebirds stab and make up?
Either **Acsenray **doesn’t understand the time lapse, or he’s covering for his booboo by being hostile and hoping to scare the dissenters away.
Or he doesn’t think it’s a big deal, which is the position I hold as well.
Well, I don’t either actually, like I said, I wasn’t even going to bring it up until someone else did. There is however, an argument to be made that if someone has been on good behavior for two months, it’s kind of an asshole move to dredge up a past pit thread about them just to smear their face in the proverbial shit pile like a naughty puppy that pooped on the carpet.
Not a booboo. I’ve done the same thing myself, bumping threads pitting shitheads rather than starting new threads about them. It’s cromulentisimo.
My comment was about his current behavior, which you are quite aware of, and your comment is remarkably tut-tutty, Mizz Shakes the Pit Schoolmarm. Do you wear your reading glasses on a chain by any chance?
This post is goofy as fuck.
I’d get behind a metapitting, really. Best behavior or not, Smapti has an intractable worldview that is essentially contrary to that of most people. Every time he ends up in a discussion in which he shares his more…unusual views, the thread derails into challenging them.
I don’t blame him at all; he’s just sharing his perspective, however wrongheaded I might find it. I blame the people who challenge him for the thread derailment. Threads turn into the Smapti Show because of us, not him.
The problem with that is that everyone encounters him for the first time, and his beliefs are literally so unbelievable that of course you challenge them. When I cited the bit in the other thread about a cop arresting Michael and charging him with the crime of giving his name as Mike, I was certain, like 100% certain, that he wouldn’t try to defend that. How could I have known?
Nah, I’m with you. I don’t really mean anything negative by “blame.” I just have trouble holding Smappers really responsible for derailing threads.
That was the final note for me, too. Much of his logic is bordering on the absurd, but manages to stay barely in the realm of reason if you adopt the extremely authoritarian viewpoint that he so clearly has. But that was where I finally realized he was completely irredeemable. I think the boards would be better without him posting here.
Which you offer no counter argument too.
Do you bump them without providing any indicators of the new asshattery that inspired the bump?