Smarter: Book!Tarzan or Book!Sherlock Holmes?

Just to make sure the poll doesn’t match the thread title, I think I’ll throw Nero Wolfe in in there too. And Doc Savage. But not the Scarlet Pimpernel. I spit on that limey bastard and everything he represents.

By Book!Tarzan, of course, I mean Tarzan as written by Edgar Rice Burroughs, and likewise Book!Holmes refers to the Doyle short stories and novels. No other authors need apply. Not that it matters, you hosers are gonna do whatever you want anyway, I don’t know why I even bother. The point is that this is a literature thread, not a cinema thread. It’s not that I don’t love the Johnny Weismueller movies; I just don’t want anybody bringing that … thing … Disney put out a few years ago, or the Bo Derek “movie” from the 80s or 70s or whenever the hell it was, I am certainly not Googling it. Likewise, anyone who brings up that abomination starring Iron Man and Alfie will have his or her hard cider ration reduced bvy 4/5.

Poll in a moment.

If you put Tarzan in London and ask him to be perceptive and make deductions and study the occasional footprint, I figure he’ll do okay; he’s not Holmes, but he’s brilliant. If you put Sherlock Holmes in the jungle and ask him to communicate with mammals of all shapes and sizes, I figure he doesn’t actually wind up doing that.

That is a filthy lie. Holmes will CERTAINLY communicate to the lions, at least, that lunch is served.

ETA: Someone once made the exact same point you just did about Aquaman and Batman, Waldo.

Holmes is the epitome of intellect. Put him in the jungle and he’d figure out whatever he needs to know ever *without *talking to any of the animals.

As in the poll option, Tarzan taught himself how to read using an illustrated primer, as a child, with all but minimal contact with any other humans. Impossible in reality, but if it happened it points to a greater intellect than the any of the others possessed, at least as a child.

Besides that he could beat the snot out of all the others.

If this was intentional, it’s simultaneously a vile insult, and one of the most subtly-constructed vile insults I’ve seen.

FTR, I almost didn’t participate due to your odd animus to the Scarlet Pimpernel, whom I adore. I demand satisfaction. Cake at 50 paces, sirrah!

You could try to spit on him. But I hear that he’s demmed elusive.

Holmes is no pushover in a fight. Even Dr. Challenger is pretty impressive, and could give a damn good showing with his fists. Doc Savage, of course, whips the lot, and could probably defeat them all at once. He’s a “superhero” and the others are all just “heroes.”

In the intelligence department, Holmes has systematized reasoning. Tarzan is smart, but has never examined his own intelligence nor tried to analyze its workings.

Tarzan is the man who was given a fish, but Holmes is the man who has learned how to bait a hook and cast a line.

I’m not subtle. Hell, I don’t even know that the Pimpernel’s first name is Percy.

Sink me.

So you’re challenging to a duel–i.e., warning–the one board member guaranteed to cheat on principle?

Well, it’s just cake… :o Kind of a win-win :stuck_out_tongue: