I was reading the editorial section of today’s paper (New Zealand Sunday Star Times) and I came across a letter about the use of radioactive material in smoke detectors.
The letter had an almost conspiricy theory tone about, with a claim that information about smoke detectos was "being withheld from the public world-wide.
I was aware that very small quantities of Americium were used in most smoke detectors, but this letter implied (without actually saying, mind you) that this was dangerous and quoted that an (unnamed) test of 200 smoke detectors had shown that “all emmited between 300-400 counts of radition per second”
Now, I don’t have a clue as to how to interpret that figure, so two questions.
“Counts per second” is the number of photons detector by an instrument every second. Unless they tell you the size and efficiency of the detector as well as the distance from the source, it’s a meaningless number.
We handled Alpha-emitting radiation sources all the time in high-school chemistry, with hardly any special equipment. Like Desmostylus said, Alpha rays (aka Helium nuclei) can be completely blocked by a single sheet of paper, and make up most of the radiation in a detector. Gamma rays, although much more dangerous, are emitted in such low quantity as to be negligible compared to background radiation. Even if you were to remove the radioactive source, I think your dosage would still be negligible, unless you decided to sleep with it close to your head on a regular basis or something