The article makes no mention, though, of the “G or Y” theory :rolleyes: or the 1975 radio program (or any other supposed origin). Or Cecil. :mad:
*I’m posting in MPSIMS instead of CCC because (1) it doesn’t get much more mundane and pointless than this, and (2) most other threads on this subject have appeared here, including one thread by Coldfire.
At least they say the “original wording theory” is just a guess, unlike others (Cecil included) who accept it as fact. It might be true, but at this time there’s absolutely no corroboration.
Snopes’ explanation for the wording of the riddle left me more confused than anything. I had always assumed the “if you listened very carefully, I’ve already told you” bit refered to the part where you say “ending in -gry”-- with “gry” being the accepted answer to the puzzle.
Why would Snopes be required to mention Cecil? They don’t quote him, and basically the only thing connecting them is that Cecil wrote a column, and so did the Mikkelsons. There’s really no reason to mention him.
Mixie, the original wording says “There are three words in the English language.” The first word would be ‘the,’ the second word would be ‘English,’ and the third word would be ‘language.’
Cecil wasn’t the first guy to write about this either, you know. I imagine there are other topics common to both sites - I happen to be a big fan of snopes as well. After I check my e-mail in the morning, I immediately check for new material on Snopes and the Straight Dope.
They sure do mention the ‘g’ or ‘y’ theory when relating how the riddle could have been succesful as being delivered orally:
below from Snopes…
“…The catch here is that by offering the examples of “hungry” and “angry,” the teller misleads the listener into thinking he’s asking for a word ending in “GRY” when he’s really asking for a word ending in “G or Y.” The correct answer in this case is “say,” a short word ending in “y” which the teller had pronounced three times in the course of presenting the riddle…”
Actually, it’s possible that at least one out of five recipients will be a reader of either the Dope or Snopes and will respond with a short-tempered, “NOT THIS STUPID THING AGAIN, READ THIS LINK GODDAMMIT!”
So the answer may very well “pop up on the screen automatically.” From a certain point of view.