So factual jr modding is OK now?

[Joey_P]

@Banquet_Bear

…Czarcasm responded to questions asked by the OP, he responded to other posters, I didn’t see anything excessive there.

It’s hard to see this as not being excessive…

@Czarcasm

Please cite any of these so-called “facts” that you wish to discuss. For example, it has been said by who that 1 in every 100 of us are psychopaths?

@Czarcasm

At least one of us understands the difference between “potentiality” and “reality”.

@Daz_the_burner_Rush

Czarcasm, if you were to correctly read my post i did not mention anything as ‘fact’, merely something that ‘has been said’.
I was trying to make the point that most of us now recognize that there are many functioning psychopaths within society, something that interests me. I do not pretend to know much on the subject, so please forgive me ‘Czarcasm’ for any future posts that do not contain accurate info.

@Czarcasm

Again, said by who?

@Daz_the_burner_Rush

Why exactly does this matter, if you understand the general point i was trying to make? It could be some bloke at a bar, it was a glib statement used to make a point.

@Czarcasm

It matters who said it if we are to consider it as a possible statement of fact.

@Daz_the_burner_Rush

I never asked for it to be considered a statement of fact, please read my previous post again. I think you want to reconsider using the word ‘we’, I think other people have read and understood my post as intended.

@Czarcasm

The OP is asking for opinions based on unattributed(and wrong) definitions and “facts”, and I just happened to notice what forum he posted this thread in.
Did you?

@Czarcasm

Since “psychopath” is a legal term rather than a medical term, and since legalities change from location to location, and since none of the laws that deal with “psychopathy” as they describe it get into its permanency there can be no factual answer to this question. Calls for individual opinions, probably best suited for Great Debates or IMHO?

@Czarcasm

Thanks for trying.
Where did you get that “80%” stat from jtur88?

IMO, the OP would have been best off asking for the thread to be closed and re-writing it with that line left out (since it was just a throwaway line), then reporting Czarcasm if he brings it up again in the new thread.