Exactly. The symbol in the picture is a traditional good luck symbol from the Indian subcontinent; its used (amongst other things) at weddings and the such like to symbolise luck for the new couple; as it stands in that picture, its not offensive, and is entirely within context. Quartz, you’re reading too much into it, with a very post-WWII, Western European slant.
But, true though it is, I think this argument is beside the point. Quartz linked to a news page – if there had been a neo-nazi rally with Swastika banners, that would have been news too, and the BBC would likely have had photos. The first page I linked to above showed the Nazi version of the swastika, using it perfectly legitimately to illustrate a story. By doing this, the BBC is in no way endorsing the activities of the Nazi party, they are simply reporting the news. If I had a pound for every time the BBC has displayed a swastika in one of their TV programmes or publications, I wouldn’t have my bank manager breathing down my neck.
The swastika has been used, and still is, by violent racists, but it is the racism that is the problem, not the symbol itself. To avoid any use of it at all, no matter what the reason, smacks to me of superstition of the most primitive sort.
Fair enough - Wikipedia gives a good summation of just how complex the issue really is, and how difficult it is to draw any firm conclusions: Richard Wagner - Wikipedia