But the truth is that the tone of this thread was a bit more …er… gleefully anticipatory. I, at least, got the sense that it was in part a sort of ameliorative reaction to the election result: sure, Walker may have avoided removal via recall, but will he now be indicted?
If Walker serves out his term and then leaves, with an indictment never happening, that would – in my imagination, anyway – be an unwelcome rebuttal to the OP.
You’re comparing two things that can’t be compared. First you are looking at a single point in time and saying at that particular point in time there is a discrete number of coins, a limited amount of wealth. That’s fine. But then you go and say that there’s a potential problem with that if it “becomes concentrated in the hands of the few”. (emphasis mine)
Your “becomes” has time time turned on and can’t be compared to a single frozen point of time.
I haven’t been following this thread, but I’m kinda used to not seeing it on the front page of the forum.
From what I can glean about the antecedents of this post, I have to say that it strikes me as tiresome, somewhat petulant, and not consistent with the image I carry of you, in re: dignified participation in these boards.
I do hope you’ll forgive my making a personal comment. I hope you are well, and that you spent your holiday weekend profitably.
Meanwhile, Scotty has started running for president / vice president. He’s been visiting Iowa and has made speeches in places like Alabama where he was complemented for turning Wisconsin into an Alabama like state.