Part of me is saying, its comics and movies, Bub… Let it go.
But the other, pull-everything to pieces part is trying to ascertain why Peter Parkers genetic spider bite didnt affect him in the same way as Seth Brundle’s unfortunate fly in the machine accident.
Whether you side with radioactive or genetically enhanced spiders, the end result is the same; Parker got his powers by having his genes spliced with those of a spider.
Brundle also had his genes spliced with those of a fly (although I think they used the term Fused), and for a while it was all gravy… he was athletic, strong, walks on walls… but the mutation continued, and, well, we know all about the puke, puke, suck, suck, glug, glug.
Why was Parker so lucky? Is there a difference between Genetic Splicing and Genetic Fusion? Parker definatley mutated to a certain degree (the spider hairs that sprouted from his finger tips allowing him to scale walls and his, ahem, organic webshooters), but why was this mmutation retarded at a certain point? Is there a danger of him becoming more Spider-like and well, gross in later years?
And this is the kicker; If Peter Parker and Mary-Jane concieve a child, will that child be normal, or will MJ’s labor end up like Veronica’s?
It seems one of these stories is EXTREMLY flawed, and given my love for both Spider-man and The Fly, I’m not sure I want to know which one is BS. Something tells me that The Fly is a more accurate account of what would happen in a gene splicing accident. I really shouldnt get so worked up about works of fiction, but hey; thats just me.