Social Contracts

Who’s Social Contract is the best? In case you don’t know, here are some cursory breakdowns:

Locke
natural rights - life liberty and property
state of nature - good but could be better
people can rebel if theres a “long train of abuses”

Rousseau
General Will - anything the people want, the gov’t does
state of nature - as good as it gets
people cannot rebel
(this is only one interpreatation, others say Rousseau meant the opposite)

Hobbes
absolute gov’t authority
state of nature - bad as it gets
people can’t rebel

If you can think of one I didnt mention there, feel free to provide a breakdown of what it says, and we’ll discuss. And please, lets keep this abstract. No ridiculous comparisons to Hitler, Taliban, etc. Refute things based on their merit.

Personally, I like Rousseau. I think the General Will will automatically encompass Locke’s natural rights plus many other good things.

This sounds like an IMHO thread, IMHO, but I’d like to clarify something. Rousseau doesn’t dictate that the government should do anything the people want. Rousseau asserts that the governent should mitigate when two people acting within natural law conflict.