You see @Beckdawrek, that is your singular experience in the US. And sure, I’m aware that many people are extremely happy with the care they receive, but unfortunately your experience is not universal. From my understanding, many more people are spectacularly dissatisfied with the US model of health care.
My experience however is the norm in Australia. As an example (which I alluded to in one of my earlier posts) take a car accident, where two people are seriously injured.
One person is a homeless person, run down by a car (accidentally) driven by a multi-millionaire. The driver is also injured after then veering off into a light pole.
Ambulances and paramedics are despatched. The nature of the injuries means that the victims need to be transported to Critical Care facilities, meaning the top tier public hospitals in the area. They will NOT be taken to private hospitals.
Both are admitted, receive the best of possible care and both survive…but need ongoing physiotherapy and perhaps occupational therapy in the future.
All of this is covered by Medicare (and depending upon which state you live in (example here in Victoria, the Transport Accident Commission) ) you will not get any out of pocket expenses apart from ongoing medications. Those covered by the government cost around $27 (IIRC) or for the homeless person, around $7.
The quality of care is EXACTLY the same for every patient admitted to hospital after an accident.
Now for chronic, ongoing health issues, sometimes the outcomes can be different, and many people feel a need to take out private insurance to ensure they don’t wait around too long for elective surgery or care. That’s fine, our system can handle both.
BUT, if you are seriously ill, your care, my care, my expenses, your expenses will be identical no matter who you are or where you are in the country.
That is Universal Health Coverage.