Not to speak for him but Airman might be thinking better enforcement of current warnings and rules, not more stringent ones. A more prominent “last warning” list said to be now implemented in the mod forum will probably go a long way to addressing Airman’s concerns ISTM.
As far as a rule change, maybe anyone on last chance should automatically have his thread starting abilities cut off and be on a strict “no hijacking” probation for some set period.
How about we just stick to the “don’t be a jerk” rule, and if someone gets “terminated”, their offenses (or some of their worst ones) are linked to. Banning the annoying is pretty broad. Every one of us is annoying to someone. All of us. If annoying was all it took, SDMB would be pretty empty. If smeone is a sock, then I’m fine with both the sock and the “real person” being obliterated.
When a centaur senses censors
It, incensed, dissents from censures,
Since the incense of a censer
Is incendiary scenture.
When tension tends on to dissension
Pretension distends the contention
Until comprehension
Portends apprehension,
Detention, and swift sock suspension.
If I were a poster in this thread, I’d be looking over my shoulder for a quadruped with spots, and a pretty good view of the terrain for, oh, say…6 miles around. :eek:
Nah, as long as a couple of them keep talking about the rules or moderating or whatever, the rest pretty much have carte blanche to act silly. It’s a loophole, like having diplomatic immunity or taking the license plate off your car and driving on the sidewalk. I am powerless to stop them.
Unless they piss me off, of course, and then watch out. I’ll waggle my finger at the screen so menacingly you won’t believe it.