Okay, I know I chap your ass a lot about turning every thread into a debate on libertarian principles, so I hope you’ll forgive my hypocrisy in asking you:
How do you reconcile the above post with the concept that nobody may initiate force or fraud against anyone else?
Nope, different Gallo, one was Joey and I forget the other one’s name. They were the type that nobody on either side of the law missed or shed a tear over. In fact, everyone breathed a sigh of relief.
Would that be the libertarian perspective on the subject? It’s okay to use violence on a private citizen to force him to change a harmless (if offensive) behavior? And it’s okay for the state to look the other way if the perpetrator has enough money and influence? So much for standing up to tyranny and coercion, I guess.
I knew there’d be a few assholes defending the thug in the OP; I never for a moment expected you to be one of them.
Maybe it’s wrong but my sympathies lie with the old man. Not because he’s a “mobster” getting away with something but because a punk-ass kid got a dose of reality.
Sometimes there is such a thing as a guy who had it coming.
I didn’t say it was okay; I said it was civil disobedience — breaking the law. The finger-breaker should be punished, and forced to restore the punk’s finger. Nevertheless, the punk has learned a valuable lesson about civility and the possible consequences of being a jackass. It is no different than when I’ve said that if I saw a neighbor abusing a child, for example, I would intervene, whip his ass to a pulp, and then suffer the consequences.
Yes, I suppose he did. He learned that civility is not a concern of the rich and powerful, that those who have neither wealth nor influence have no protection from those that do, and, most importantly of all, that violence is an acceptable response to even the most minor slight.
I am impressed, as always, by your exemplary Christian attitude, Lib.
That’s correct! You are well on your way to becoming a true Red Blooded American Vigilante Hero[sup]tm[/sup]! You laugh in the face of wimpy laws, because you know what’s RIGHT! Congratulations!
Are you fucking NUTS? Some fucking mobster, who has spent his whole life cheating, stealing and murdering to help himself to the fruits of the labor of innocent people deserves in his old age to be able to assault people and break their fucking bones with fucking impunity? What the everloving fuck is wrong with you? You think justice is served when people get their bones broken for things that aren’t even illegal? Do you think we live under the fucking Taliban? You think this is justice? Justice would be if the kid had pulled out a Glock 17 and wasted the scumsucking bastard. Fuck the criminal jackass. You think that the police, whose job it is to protect the very people the degenerate lowlife has been fucking in the ass his whole life, ignoring his crimes because he is a FUCKING CRIMINAL is respecting the social order?
If some punk had broken his neice’s finger, they’d be in a shallow grave on the outskirts of town, or doing five to ten for assault and battery at the least.