Speed of light and absolute zero

[sweeteviljesus]

My dad was saying something the other day about the relationship between the speed of light and absolute zero. I am confident he didn’t have his facts right, but IIRC, there is some way in which they are related. Can the usual suspects enlighten me?

Thanks,
Rob

[Squink]

Likely your dad heard something about the effect of Bose Einstein condensates on the speed of light:
Physicists Slow Speed of Light

Light, which normally travels the 240,000 miles from the Moon to Earth in less than two seconds, has been slowed to the speed of a minivan in rush-hour traffic – 38 miles an hour.

An entirely new state of matter, first observed four years ago, has made this possible. When atoms become packed super-closely together at super-low temperatures and super-high vacuum, they lose their identity as individual particles and act like a single super- atom with characteristics similar to a laser.

Such an exotic medium can be engineered to slow a light beam 20 million-fold from 186,282 miles a second to a pokey 38 miles an hour.

The cite’s from 1999, when physicists first started reporting the effect. Since then, other tricks have been played on the lowly photon: Light Changed to Matter, Then Stopped and Moved

[Grey]

It should be noted that any kind of matter slows down light. Cherenkov radiation (when charged particles move faster through matter than photons) is a neat example of this.

[Psycho_Originals]

I saw on www.livescience.com last year that scientists have actually made light go in reverse. I didnt understand the physics of it at all, hopefully someone can find this article, because i have not been able to find anything.

[FatBaldGuy]

[QUOTE=Psycho Originals]
I saw on www.livescience.com last year that scientists have actually made light go in reverse.
[/QUOTE]
Heck, that’s easy to do. Just hold up a mirror.

[Chronos]

I saw on www.livescience.com last year that scientists have actually made light go in reverse. I didnt understand the physics of it at all, hopefully someone can find this article, because i have not been able to find anything.

Nothing too fancy there. Once you get the trick of slowing light down to 38 mph or 15 mph or whatever, you just put the whole apparatus on a truck driving in the other direction at a faster speed.

[Santo_Rugger]

[QUOTE=Chronos]
Nothing too fancy there. Once you get the trick of slowing light down to 38 mph or 15 mph or whatever, you just put the whole apparatus on a truck driving in the other direction at a faster speed.
[/QUOTE]

Oh, sure, it’s going in reverse in your reference frame, but it’s still going forward relative to the guy in the truck.

Or something.

[OldGuy]

[QUOTE=Squink]
An entirely new state of matter, first observed four years ago, has made this possible. When atoms become packed super-closely together at super-low temperatures and super-high vacuum, they lose their identity as individual particles and act like a single super- atom with characteristics similar to a laser.
[/QUOTE]

Just how do you pack atoms closely together in a vacuum? A vacuum is the absence of any atoms (or particles) at all.

[Squink]

By vacuum, they mean that there’s nothing in there besides their closely packed array of sodium atoms.

[Mangetout]

[QUOTE=Chronos]
Nothing too fancy there. Once you get the trick of slowing light down to 38 mph or 15 mph or whatever, you just put the whole apparatus on a truck driving in the other direction at a faster speed.
[/QUOTE]

Is this a whoosh? Isn’t the speed of light independent of reference frame? Or does that only count when it’s going full whack?

[Liberal]

[QUOTE=Mangetout]
Is this a whoosh? Isn’t the speed of light independent of reference frame? Or does that only count when it’s going full whack?
[/QUOTE]
I believe it applies only to the speed of light in vacuum. At least, Einsteins first premise was that the speed of light is constant in a vacuum.

[David_Simmons]

[QUOTE=Mangetout]
Is this a whoosh? Isn’t the speed of light independent of reference frame? Or does that only count when it’s going full whack?
[/QUOTE]
c is the speed of light in a vacuum and is the maximum rate that light, or anything else, can have. Electro magnetic waves such as light travel slower in a medium such as glass or air or water.

[Mangetout]

I understand that, but it’s the relativistic aspects I don’t get - if we have light travelling at, say, 0.75c in water and I am travelling at 0.75c in the opposite direction towards it (ignoring for a moment that such velocity would be rather difficult for a physical object in water), do I observe the light as incoming at a greater velocity than c?

[Chronos]

if we have light travelling at, say, 0.75c in water and I am travelling at 0.75c in the opposite direction towards it (ignoring for a moment that such velocity would be rather difficult for a physical object in water), do I observe the light as incoming at a greater velocity than c?

No. Light moving at .75c relative to water behaves the same way as anything else moving at .75c relative to water, and in no case will your velocity ever be greater than c relative to anything.

[Der_Trihs]

[QUOTE=sweeteviljesus]
My dad was saying something the other day about the relationship between the speed of light and absolute zero. I am confident he didn’t have his facts right, but IIRC, there is some way in which they are related. Can the usual suspects enlighten me?
[/QUOTE]
I often hear them compared because neither can be reached, only approached. You can’t ever accelerate to lightspeed, nor can you chill something to absolute zero.