'Splain to me front door cams

Hi there. I’m trying to google up a “front door camera” and I’ve been shunted into this strange world of doorbell cameras. It’s insane: $250 doorbells that sense motion and have SD card slots for no discernible reason. I’m not trying to replace my doorbell, I just want to sticky a camera to my front door and look at it on my PC when the doorbell rings. It seems like this should cost <$30 right?

Sample doorbell nonsense search link here. Is there a product I can just bungee to my door and replace the battery quarterly that gives me a camera I can see on my PC? Thanks!

I think Wyze does that, and it’s pretty cheap. I don’t know about batteries, though. There are lots of Wyze options on Amazon. (My boss recommended it, but I haven’t gotten anything yet.)

Wyze is wired charging

I think you are asking for a lot for under $30. Wi-fi capable outdoor camera that can wake-on wi-fi and a battery that lasts for 3 months? The battery alone will cost more than that.

Fine. I’d like a $50 cam that takes batteries and can be flush mounted to my door. No doorbell shit. I just want a camera. 802.11whatever. The door rings and I look at my phone/tablet/PC to see who it is.

The camera is ideally a rectangle smaller but as thin as a cellphone. Much like a doorbell cam but with zero capabilities. A camera. Double-sticky-tape it to the door, initialize the app on your device, done.

Does this really not exist in some form? Cheap front door cam?

If you want to go that cheap, I’d probably do something like this -

In short, if you have an old smartphone sitting in a box, you can repurpose it . . . buuuuuut, you’d need to bungie it up where it has a space to plug in.

All of the non-wired versions I’ve seen have used at most a pair of AAs - and I doubt they’d last more than a month. But there are cheaper options than say Amazon’s Ring system, even on Amazon. :slight_smile:

The problem is most of the things you’re looking at need to be big enough to hold the batteries. Which kinda requires bigness or expensive LI batteries. I’d do a search on the various ‘spy’ cameras, which . . . might meet your needs. But make me feel icky searching.

If you can live with a non-wired doorbell, this seems the best ‘cheap and cheerful’ option though.

Probably not. It’s expensive to get batteries into a cell-phone form factor. And they wouldn’t have the capacity needed for months.

My ring camera is pretty bulky, but only because of the battery. The button for the doorbell function and the electronics for some of the other fancy functionality doesn’t take up any space. And probably doesn’t add much to the cost either.

FINE: $100. A box I can stick to my door. It’s a camera, it’s not a doorbell. When someone rings the doorbell I can see them on a mobile or desktop device over wifi.

Does this really not exist?

Maybe, but I think most others who want the functionality you are talking about also want it to be a doorbell.

You’re talking about having to open some sort of separate program when you hear the doorbell to see the camera.

As opposed to the camera feed automatically popping up on your mobile when the doorbell is rung (or a notification you can click on). Also the battery will last longer because it only has to wake-up when the button is pressed instead of always monitoring the wi-fi.

I have a doorbell. It works great. I want to see who is at the doorbell sometimes. This doesn’t seem like a corner case.

I thought one of the benefits of many of the door cameras is that they can be powered using the existing doorbell wiring.

You want a camera that functions in response to the doorbell ringing. The most obvious way to achieve this is to have a camera integrated with the doorbell. You may say you already have a doorbell and all you want is a camera, but from a manufacturers point of view, it makes most sense to just integrate the two.

There are both versions. Mine has a big battery since I didn’t have the doorbell wiring.

Wyze I think makes a motion activated battery powered cam.

Right, how is a camera supposed to know the doorbell was rung if it’s not part of the camera? A motion-activated camera seems like the best option then, because it would pick up someone just knocking on the door, or dropping off a package without otherwise announcing their presence.

Look at the Blink Video and Ring systems available on Amazon. They start around $50.

I have a Ring I got free, no subscription in use. It works OK, I don’t strongly recommend it but it does what you’re looking for.

As an alternative, there are inexpensive WiFi security cameras that can be mounted overhead with a view of the door.

When the doorbell rings you can check who’s there on the phone app.

I’ve done this. I used my old iPod Touch and a free app called “Manything.” You can connect up to one device for no charge. I was using it indoors to monitor my elderly, sick cats when I was at work.

Just curious, but why are you against replacing the doorbell? The Google Ring (what I have, but it’s identical to other options) was super easy to install. Remove doorbell, plug Ring in instead, connect to wifi, done.

It’s doesn’t know. I want it to work all the time, regardless of the doorbell.