Ok here’s the scoop. One of my co-workers had this lump rtemoved from his knee (thinking it could be dangerous). it turned out to be benign and when they did the biopsy on it, it turns out that the tissue was classified as muscle tissue found only in the vagina.
Does this happen often where males will spontaneously produce tissue found only in females?
Did they tell him the specific name of the muscle? Or whose vagina was it from? Is it possible that his wife rubbed her vagina on his knee and a piece got stuck there? My grandma warned me about these quinky sex many years ago.
If they did not provide this important information, your co-worker has a good malpractice case.
To answer your question: it happens all the time, we are just too ashamed to say something: “They just rtemoved this cunt from my elbow, next week they’ll rid me of the breasts, too”.
it wasn’t a particular muscle but a muscle tissue type.
Tumors and cysts often grow that have all kinds of weird tissue inside them, like hair and teeth and whatnot. Vaginal muscle tissue wouldn’t be that surprising, I think, esp. given that fetuses are essentially the same in that area before they start developing, and that each sex has analagous structures (clitoris/glans penis; testicles/ovaries; scrotum/labia).
So, Toad, what you are saying: that male knee is analogous to vagina? Could you give me the name of the referred tumors and cysts, I will look them up myself.
And how do fetuses enter the picture? I thought, he had enough problems with knee kicking vaginas.
BMU, so, which one was it a particular muscle from vagina or not? Or his wife has many different muscles in the vagina and they couldn’t identify it by name (like biceps, triceps, etc.)?
Peace, as i had posted earlier it wasn’t a particular vaginal muscle, but vaginal muscule tissue. Meaning a muscle tissue with the properties of vaginal muscle tissue.
Also he does not have a wife.
Also you are annoying us with your attempts at humor, please stop.
I can’t say how common it is, but it’s certainly possible. Sounds like some gene expression got screwed up somehow. Like toad said, tumors often have screwy regulation, and so end up expressing all kinds of tissue types. Ovarian cysts, in particular, are notorious for this. There have been teeth, hair, etc, found in them.
Hey Burn! Long time, no see! Only you would post this topic 
Anyway, a friend of mine had a tumor in his back that he had removed. When they got in there, they removed what were essentially extra vertabrae, but not attached ones that belonged to his spine. They surmised that he may at one point have been a twin in utro, and the other fetus died, and his body absorbed the dead tissue. For him it resulted in an “extra” spine (although much smaller). Majorly weird.
I’m thinking it could be a similar thing with your co-worker. Perhaps he absorbed some tissue while in-utro and it’s only known because he developed a lump from it.
Zette
BMU, I oblige and stop the humor. If you really want the answer, do the following:
Ask you co-worker to get a copy of the “Pathological examination report” which was prepared the day following the operation, if this was done in the U.S. or Canada. The report is in his hospital/doctors chart, is available for free or at nominal cost (xerox) on demand (it’s his tumor, his chart, etc.). He/his insurance co. was charged for the pathologic examination. I’ll tell you everything after you publish the report here.